Repository navigation
Explain component kit dependencies with a working PDF and HTML report - #155
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Component consumers need to know whether a reusable kit works on its own or requires document theme values. This guide and downloadable report demonstrate both contracts: a concrete palette factory and a kit with explicit prefixed tokens. Authors can rebrand either card or override one named part without inspecting generated selectors.
The guide explains defaults versus instance choices, missing bindings, document-wide token collisions, print/screen styling, and styled/unstyled HTML export. It links from the existing component guides and examples. Both modules are maintainer-authored; independent author feedback and the alpha stability decision remain open.
Validation:
The PNG gate requires identical format, mode, dimensions, metadata and every decoded pixel. PNG compression can differ between platforms; the retained first Linux artifact had identical pixels and all four identical PDFs. Seven tests cover equivalent compression, altered pixels, dimensions, mode, gamma metadata, invalid data and a different image format. No visual tolerance or PDF-byte check was relaxed.