Remove the reproduction/replication outcome combinations table (#54) - #69
Open
LukasWallrich wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Remove the reproduction/replication outcome combinations table (#54)#69LukasWallrich wants to merge 1 commit into
LukasWallrich wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes the table of reproduction/replication outcome combinations (cases A-D) from
understanding.qmd, together with the sentence introducing it. The "possible interpretation" column read as a single claim about "replication", which covers designs that differ too widely for one interpretation to hold.The reference to @TuringWay2025 is kept: it now closes the preceding paragraph on terminology, as "A similar distinction between reproductions and replications is made by @TuringWay2025, with a less specific terminology for reproductions."
The following paragraph ("Reproduction and replication should always be considered together...") stands on its own and is unchanged. No other cross-reference to
tbl-rep-outcomesexists in the sources. The chapter renders without citation or cross-reference warnings.Closes #54