Refactor/sync with core package update #139
Conversation
- Update git ref in pubspec.yaml and pubspec.lock - Change ref from b3bf1fbe84c51006c55c0eed7fb5de2f11a95208 to e66e076572bd326e50e9d5286ef5059ff658ed65
- Add new positive interaction types for app review settings - Introduce interaction cycle threshold as a replacement for positive interaction threshold - Update descriptions and labels for app review prompt settings
- Rename positiveInteractionThreshold to interactionCycleThreshold - Add localization support for interaction cycle threshold label and description - Implement switchable list for eligible positive interactions - Update UI to display new interaction types and their descriptions
- Update the color mapping for ReportableEntity.comment in the _ReportsDataSource class -
…lization - Change ReportableEntity.engagement to ReportableEntity.comment - Ensure proper localization key is used for comment entity
… types - Add null check for engagement.reaction and display "N/A" if null - Implement extension method to provide localized names for reaction types - Update UI to use localized reaction type names
- Modify the style of the 'not available' text in the engagements page - Use onSurface color with 60% opacity for better visibility
Summary of ChangesHello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates updates from the core package, leading to significant refactoring and enhancements in the application's feedback and community management features. The changes provide administrators with more precise control over the conditions that trigger app review prompts by allowing them to define specific positive user interactions. Additionally, it improves the robustness of engagement data display and clarifies terminology for reportable content types, ensuring a more consistent and user-friendly experience. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request primarily focuses on refactoring the codebase to synchronize with an update in the core package. The changes include renaming variables and enums for improved clarity, updating localization strings, and introducing a new feature for configuring eligible positive interactions for app reviews. The overall code quality is high, and the changes are consistent and well-implemented. I have provided one suggestion to enhance the readability and maintainability of a newly added callback by simplifying its structure and adhering to a more functional programming style.
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Backlog
to Done
in Flutter News App Project
Status
READY
Description
This pull request integrates updates from the core package, leading to significant refactoring and enhancements in the application's feedback and community management features. The changes provide administrators with more precise control over the conditions that trigger app review prompts by allowing them to define specific positive user interactions. Additionally, it improves the robustness of engagement data display and clarifies terminology for reportable content types, ensuring a more consistent and user-friendly experience.
Type of Change