Skip to content

docs: enumerate supported SAN keys for Android certificates (#41472)#44680

Open
getvictor wants to merge 2 commits intodocs-v4.86.0from
victor/41472-san-docs
Open

docs: enumerate supported SAN keys for Android certificates (#41472)#44680
getvictor wants to merge 2 commits intodocs-v4.86.0from
victor/41472-san-docs

Conversation

@getvictor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related issue: Resolves #41472

@getvictor getvictor marked this pull request as ready for review May 4, 2026 17:21
@getvictor getvictor requested a review from rachaelshaw as a code owner May 4, 2026 17:21
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Claude Code Review

This repository is configured for manual code reviews. Comment @claude review to trigger a review and subscribe this PR to future pushes, or @claude review once for a one-time review.

Tip: disable this comment in your organization's Code Review settings.

@getvictor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@marko-lisica I enumerated the 5 supported SAN values here. They should also be placeholders in Figma so that IT admin doesn't need to dig through documentation to find which SAN attributes are supported.


Example: `"DNS=wifi.example.com, UPN=$FLEET_VAR_HOST_END_USER_IDP_USERNAME"`.

You can use [Fleet's host variables](https://fleetdm.com/docs/configuration/yaml-files#variables) in `subject_name` and `subject_alternative_name` to make the certificate unique to each host.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Variables will be moved into a dedicated guide in 4.86. PR is still in review.
#43212

@marko-lisica
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rachaelshaw I did some changes after you approved.

I referenced the YAML docs from the guide and API docs, so we don't need to keep a list of supported SAN fields in many places.

@marko-lisica marko-lisica requested a review from rachaelshaw May 5, 2026 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants