Conversation
|
Have been testing this locally and in prod (before the US wakes up) and so far it looks great! Haven't tried any new functionality like TanStackDB 0.5's subset queries, but no regressions at least! If we find anything, I'll let you know. Are there any areas in particular you'd like us to test? |
magnetised
force-pushed
the
magnetised/1.2-compatibility
branch
2 times, most recently
from
471ae0c to
9e978de
Compare
- Fix invalid protocol typing - Support more esoteric version tuples
magnetised
force-pushed
the
magnetised/1.2-compatibility
branch
from
9e978de to
22b2ec6
Compare
|
Just made the changes necessary for 1.4 compat.
Give it a spin - would appreciate any feedback. Thanks |
|
@magnetised our fork works well based off this branch, thanks! we had to make some further changes to make it work with subset queries, so I opened a draft #125 to illustrate those changes |
|
@evanob just pushed the compat to 1.5 after the security vuln discovery and the subsequent release. Shouldn't break anything but would appreciate any testing you can do. Thanks for the subquery PR - looks sane. I will try to integrate once this is merged |
2 participants
No description provided.