[Security] Remove SIEM Readiness export report section - #7977
[Security] Remove SIEM Readiness export report section#7977natasha-moore-elastic wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Elastic Docs AI PR menuCheck the box to run an AI review for this pull request.
Powered by GitHub Agentic Workflows and docs-actions. For more information, reach out to the docs team. |
🔍 Preview links for changed docs |
✅ Elastic Docs Style Checker (Vale)No issues found on modified lines! The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
|
@JordanSh @animehart @natasha-moore-elastic I think we should remove the whole documentation of SIEM readiness as its no longer exposed to our users. |
Hi @niros1, thanks for letting us know about the change. I had a quick look, and it seems SIEM Readiness is still in the product, just hidden by default from 9.5 onwards. PR #278934 ("SIEM Readiness Feature Flag Hide") put the experience behind the If that sounds right to you, here's what we'd propose instead of removing the page:
The reason we'd keep the page is that our docs are cumulative: a single page serves every supported version at once. Removing it would take the content away from 9.4 users, who still get SIEM Readiness by default, as well as anyone on 9.5+ who enables the setting. Also, one process request for next time: for any user-facing changes like this, it would be really helpful if the team could open a docs issue in this repo (elastic/docs-content) against the release the change is going into. That way we will know about upcoming changes and can document them in time for the release. Thanks again! 🙏 |
Resolves #6503
Removes the "Export a report" section from the SIEM Readiness page, since the feature isn't implemented.
There's no export or download control in the SIEM Readiness UI on Kibana
main. The only implementation work so far is a draft proof of concept (elastic/kibana#269240), so the section didn't apply to 9.4 or 9.5.Made with Cursor