-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
verification report need type #660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -933,6 +933,39 @@ needs_types: | |
| fully_verifies: ANY | ||
| partially_verifies: ANY | ||
|
|
||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_verification_report_need | ||
| mod_ver_report: | ||
| title: Module Verification Report | ||
| prefix: mod_vrep__ | ||
| mandatory_options: | ||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_common_attr_safety | ||
| safety: ^(QM|ASIL_B)$ | ||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_common_attr_security | ||
| security: ^(YES|NO)$ | ||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_common_attr_status | ||
| status: ^(valid|invalid)$ | ||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_verification_report_need | ||
| verification_method: ^.*$ | ||
| optional_options: | ||
| requirements_coverage_percent: ^(100|[1-9]?[0-9])$ | ||
| structural_coverage_percent: ^(100|[1-9]?[0-9])$ | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. branch coverage is also structural coverage, so maybe call "line/block_coverage_percent" (depending what our selected tool supports)
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. An overall value I do not think helpful |
||
| branch_coverage_percent: ^(100|[1-9]?[0-9])$ | ||
| verdict: ^(pass|fail|open)$ | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. giving a verdict is not part of the process, who would give it? based on what ...? I think we had this more in the release note. |
||
| report_version: ^.*$ | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. every needs element has a version attribute. What is special about this? |
||
| release_baseline: ^.*$ | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would still prefer: "The verification report is valid for the module version tagged together with the report" as written in the template. |
||
| mandatory_links: | ||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_verification_report_need | ||
| belongs_to: mod | ||
| optional_links: | ||
| # req-Id: tool_req__docs_verification_report_need | ||
| contains: ANY | ||
| evidence: ANY | ||
| covers: ANY | ||
| realizes: workproduct | ||
| tags: | ||
| - verification_report | ||
| parts: 3 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/main/permalink.html?id=gd_temp__change_decision_record | ||
| dec_rec: | ||
|
|
@@ -1068,6 +1101,10 @@ needs_extra_links: | |
| incoming: partially_verified_by | ||
| outgoing: partially_verifies | ||
|
|
||
| evidence: | ||
| incoming: evidence_for | ||
| outgoing: evidence | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ############################################################## | ||
| # Graph Checks | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | ||
| .. | ||
| # ******************************************************************************* | ||
| # Copyright (c) 2026 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation | ||
| # | ||
| # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional | ||
| # information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
| # | ||
| # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the | ||
| # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at | ||
| # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| # | ||
| # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
| # ******************************************************************************* | ||
| #CHECK: check_options | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| .. Base architecture and requirement objects used by verification report tests | ||
|
|
||
| .. feat:: Verification Feature | ||
| :id: feat__verification_feature | ||
| :security: YES | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :status: valid | ||
|
|
||
| .. comp:: Verification Component | ||
| :id: comp__verification_component | ||
| :security: YES | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :status: valid | ||
| :belongs_to: feat__verification_feature | ||
|
|
||
| .. mod:: Verification Module | ||
| :id: mod__verification_module | ||
| :security: YES | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :status: valid | ||
| :includes: comp__verification_component | ||
|
|
||
| .. comp_req:: Verification Requirement | ||
| :id: comp_req__verification__sample | ||
| :reqtype: Functional | ||
| :security: YES | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :status: valid | ||
|
|
||
| Requirement text for verification report tests. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| .. Valid machine-readable verification report need | ||
| #EXPECT-NOT[+2]: does not follow pattern | ||
|
|
||
| .. mod_ver_report:: Verification Report Valid | ||
| :id: mod_vrep__verification__valid | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :security: YES | ||
| :status: valid | ||
| :verification_method: test_and_inspection | ||
| :requirements_coverage_percent: 95 | ||
| :structural_coverage_percent: 90 | ||
| :branch_coverage_percent: 85 | ||
| :verdict: pass | ||
| :report_version: 1.0.0 | ||
| :release_baseline: main | ||
| :belongs_to: mod__verification_module | ||
| :covers: comp_req__verification__sample | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| .. Invalid verdict value in module verification report | ||
| #EXPECT[+2]: mod_vrep__verification__bad_verdict.verdict (pending): does not follow pattern | ||
|
|
||
| .. mod_ver_report:: Verification Report Invalid Verdict | ||
| :id: mod_vrep__verification__bad_verdict | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :security: YES | ||
| :status: invalid | ||
| :verification_method: inspection | ||
| :verdict: pending | ||
| :belongs_to: mod__verification_module |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not clear what can be seen here. maybe call it "requirements_tests_completely_passed_percent"