Skip to content

fix(metamodel): correct QM architecture validation - #1004

Closed
lavrovvalera wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
lavrovvalera:fix/qm-architecture-fulfils-validation
Closed

lavrovvalera wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
lavrovvalera:fix/qm-architecture-fulfils-validation

Conversation

@lavrovvalera

@lavrovvalera lavrovvalera commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Require QM architecture elements to fulfil only QM requirements. The previous predicate rejected QM targets and accepted ASIL_B targets.

Add production-backed regression coverage for all six requested cases, including mixed targets, exempt ASIL_B sources and empty target lists.

Fixes #1005

📌 Description

🚨 Impact Analysis

  • This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
  • This change does not violate any design decisions
  • Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

  • Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
  • Added/updated tests to cover the changes
  • Followed project coding standards and guidelines

Require QM architecture elements to fulfil only QM requirements. The
previous predicate rejected QM targets and accepted ASIL_B targets.

Add production-backed regression coverage for all six requested cases,
including mixed targets, exempt ASIL_B sources and empty target lists.

Signed-off-by: Valery Lavrov <lavrovvalera@gmail.com>
@lavrovvalera

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The changes are already done with #1001

@lavrovvalera
lavrovvalera deleted the fix/qm-architecture-fulfils-validation branch October 28, 2026 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs-as-code: Fix inverted QM architecture fulfilment validation

1 participant