Skip to content

Restore verify-if-device-is-supported FAQ#1009

Open
lyzhang0113 wants to merge 4 commits into
previewfrom
restore-verify-device-faq
Open

Restore verify-if-device-is-supported FAQ#1009
lyzhang0113 wants to merge 4 commits into
previewfrom
restore-verify-device-faq

Conversation

@lyzhang0113

@lyzhang0113 lyzhang0113 commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Restores _articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md, which was deleted in e6c4865 ("remove unused FAQ article on verifying scanner compatibility") but is still linked from what-physical-scanners-are-supported.md
  • Adds the article to the FAQ index under Capture/Image Source, between "What physical document scanners are supported?" and "How to use TWACKER"

Test plan

  • Confirm the link in what-physical-scanners-are-supported.md resolves correctly
  • Confirm the new index entry renders in the correct position under Capture/Image Source

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The article was removed in e6c4865 but is still referenced from
what-physical-scanners-are-supported.md. Restoring it and adding it
to the FAQ index under Capture/Image Source.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Restores the previously removed FAQ article about verifying scanner compatibility and re-adds it to the FAQ index so existing references (e.g., from the “physical scanners supported” FAQ) resolve again.

Changes:

  • Added _articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md back into the docs.
  • Inserted the restored article into the FAQ index under Capture/Image Source.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

File Description
_articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md Restores the “verify device support” FAQ content and links/images for scanner compatibility verification.
_articles/faq/index.md Adds a new index entry pointing to the restored FAQ article under the correct category.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread _articles/faq/index.md
Comment on lines +25 to 29
3. [How can I verify if my physical document scanner works with the Dynamic Web TWAIN SDK?](/_articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md)
4. [How to use TWACKER to check if your device is TWAIN Compliant?](/_articles/faq/how-to-use-TWACKER-to-check-if-your-device-is-TWAIN-Compliant.md)
4. [How to test if your scanner supports ICA scanning on Mac OS?](/_articles/faq/how-to-test-if-your-scanner-supports-ICA-scanning-on-Mac-OS.md)
5. [How to test if your device is SANE compliant?](/_articles/faq/how-to-test-if-your-device-is-SANE-compliant.md)
6. [How to test if your camera is DirectShow compliant?](/_articles/faq/how-to-test-if-your-camera-is-DirectShow-compliant.md)
Comment thread _articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md Outdated
Comment thread _articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md Outdated
Comment on lines +67 to +68
Use the XSane app to verify if a scanner is SANE compatible on a Linux machine.
Please check out the <a href="http://www.fifi.org/doc/xsane/html/sane-xsane-doc.html" target="_blank">official guide</a> and <a href="/assets/docs/Scanning_with_XSane.pdf" target="_blank">this document</a> for more detail.
Comment thread _articles/faq/verify-if-device-is-supported.md Outdated
ztyyLV and others added 3 commits June 11, 2026 17:55
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants