Skip to content

Conversation

@ianloic
Copy link

@ianloic ianloic commented Sep 28, 2025

pty_process::Command wraps a tokio::process::Command with additional functionality, but if you've already got a tokio::process::Command (or in fact std::process::Command) why not let you use that?

pty_process::Command wraps a tokio::process::Command with additional
functionality, but if you've already got a tokio::process::Command (or
in fact std::process::Command) why not let you use that?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant