Skip to content

docs: track aitools rename to top-level command#330

Open
jamesbroadhead wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jbroadhead/aitools-cmd-rename
Open

docs: track aitools rename to top-level command#330
jamesbroadhead wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jbroadhead/aitools-cmd-rename

Conversation

@jamesbroadhead
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Mirrors databricks/cli#4917 which promotes the aitools skills-management surface from databricks experimental aitools to top-level databricks aitools. Updates 3 install-command references in appkit docs/setup output:

  • `packages/shared/src/cli/commands/setup.ts` (×2) — the CLAUDE.md snippet emitted to user projects by `databricks-appkit setup`
  • `docs/docs/index.md` (×1)

Why now

The old `databricks experimental aitools install` path still works (it prints a deprecation warning), so this isn't a hard cutover — just keeping new copy aligned with the recommended path so users hitting these surfaces don't see a deprecation warning on first run.

Note on the `tools` subtree

`databricks experimental aitools tools` (query / discover-schema / get-default-warehouse / statement) is not being promoted in #4917. It stays under `experimental`. appkit doesn't reference any of those commands, so nothing else here needed updating.

Test plan

  • `databricks-appkit setup` emits a CLAUDE.md that points at `databricks aitools install`
  • Docs site renders the new command

This pull request was AI-assisted by Isaac.

…s install'

Mirrors the CLI change in databricks/cli#4917 which promotes the
aitools skills-management surface (install/update/uninstall/list/
version/skills) from `databricks experimental aitools` to top-level
`databricks aitools`.

The old `experimental aitools install` path still works in the CLI
(prints a deprecation warning) but new docs should use the top-level
form.

Note: the `databricks experimental aitools tools …` subtree (query,
discover-schema, get-default-warehouse, statement) intentionally stays
under experimental — appkit doesn't reference any of those, so nothing
else to update here.

Co-authored-by: Isaac
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant