downgrade github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 to v1.14.32

[blotus]

Should fix the underlying regression for #4470 and #4464 (in addition to #4471 which does seem to help).

After investigation, the regression came from the update of github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 from v1.14.23 to 1.14.44 (in this PR #4453 for the final update).

After testing the various releases of the go library, it seems the regression was introduced in v1.14.33.

I'm not sure what the regression is exactly (claude points to this commit, but I didn't looked at it in details).

So for now, let's just downgrade sqlite to get back to the performance we had before the release, and we will also improve the queries themselves (with at least #4471, and I've also identified potential gains in the way we perform the pagination for /v1/alerts, but that will come later)

[github-actions]

@blotus: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

• /kind feature
• /kind enhancement
• /kind refactoring
• /kind fix
• /kind chore
• /kind dependencies

Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

[github-actions]

@blotus: There are no area labels on this PR. You can add as many areas as you see fit.

• /area agent
• /area local-api
• /area cscli
• /area appsec
• /area security
• /area configuration

Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.88%. Comparing base (b4b2de2) to head (1e0241e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4473      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.89%   63.88%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         478      478              
  Lines       34298    34298              
==========================================
- Hits        21915    21911       -4     
- Misses      10227    10231       +4     
  Partials     2156     2156              

Flag	Coverage Δ
bats	46.45% <ø> (ø)
unit-linux	37.33% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unit-windows	25.99% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jimstrang]

Cool, this matches what I found in #4471 (comment) - will run some benchmarks on my database and report back in the #4464 issue thread.

[blotus]

/kind fix