-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
io_buffer_param is in Boost.Corosio #43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (13)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new type-erased buffer helper Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Caller as "Caller / Coroutine"
participant IOStream as "boost::corosio::io_stream_impl"
participant IOParam as "io_buffer_param"
participant OS as "Platform IO (epoll/iocp/SSL)"
Caller->>IOStream: call read_some(coroutine, exec, io_buffer_param, ...)
IOStream->>IOParam: io_buffer_param.copy_to(dest, n)
IOParam-->>IOStream: fills platform-native buffers (count)
IOStream->>OS: submit read/write with native buffers
OS-->>IOStream: completion (bytes, error)
IOStream-->>Caller: resume coroutine with result
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Comment |
|
An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://43.corosio.prtest3.cppalliance.org/index.html If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL. 2026-01-21 02:58:06 UTC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@doc/modules/ROOT/pages/guide/buffers.adoc`:
- Around line 163-171: Update the section header to match the renamed type:
change the header text "buffer_param" to "io_buffer_param" so it aligns with the
code sample and description; look for the header line that currently reads "==
buffer_param" and replace it with "== io_buffer_param" to keep the doc
consistent with the io_buffer_param class shown in the example.
In `@test/unit/io_buffer_param.cpp`:
- Around line 403-408: The comment incorrectly says "temporary" while code
passes the lvalue arr to acceptByConstRef; either update the comment to reflect
that an lvalue is passed or change the call to pass an actual temporary to
exercise the temporary-conversion path (e.g., construct and pass a temporary
std::array<capy::const_buffer,2> inline instead of the arr variable). Ensure you
still create the two capy::const_buffer elements and assert via BOOST_TEST_EQ(n,
2) after calling acceptByConstRef to preserve the test intent.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
include/boost/corosio/read.hpp (1)
16-16: Same consideration as write.hpp regarding include necessity.Similar to
write.hpp, this file doesn't appear to useio_buffer_paramdirectly. The type is used internally byio_stream::read_some. Consider removing if not needed for direct use.include/boost/corosio/write.hpp (1)
16-16: Remove the redundantio_buffer_param.hppinclude.The
io_buffer_paramheader is not directly used in this file—thewrite()function template usesConstBufferSequenceandconsuming_buffersdirectly. Sinceio_stream.hpp(included on line 14) already includesio_buffer_param.hpp, this include is transitive and unnecessary. Removing it reduces header coupling and makes the dependency chain explicit.test/unit/io_buffer_param.cpp (1)
24-37: Consider a tiny helper to reduce repeated copy_to assertions.The copy-to-assert pattern is repeated across many tests; a small helper (e.g.,
assert_copy_to(...)) would reduce duplication and make future changes easier.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tests
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.