Skip to content

Conversation

@MungoG
Copy link

@MungoG MungoG commented Jan 20, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added a comprehensive project overview describing the coroutine-first I/O library for C++20, async primitives, and executor affinity behavior.
    • Included status badges, links for branches/docs/CI, and license information.
  • Chores

    • Updated ignore rules to add new entries and refine a path-specific ignore pattern.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new README.adoc with project overview, status badges, asynchronous I/O and affine awaitable protocol description, and license section; updates .gitignore to add ignore entries and adjust a CMake presets rule.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.adoc
New top-level README added: status badges table, project overview for Boost.Corosio, description of coroutine-first async I/O and executor affinity (affine awaitable protocol), and Boost Software License section.
Repository config
/.gitignore
Added ignore patterns /.clangd and /tmpclaude-*-cwd; changed CMakeUserPresets.json ignore to be root-anchored (/CMakeUserPresets.json).

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A README hops in, crisp and bright,
Badges gleam in careful sight.
Coroutines hum, executors sing,
License seals the gentle spring.
Hooray — the docs make the garden tight!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "readme file" is vague and generic, lacking specificity about what the README adds or its purpose. Use a more descriptive title that conveys the main change, such as 'Add comprehensive README with project overview and build status' or 'Document Corosio project overview and build badges'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@README.adoc`:
- Line 8: Replace the first-column cell that currently contains the markdown
link string "|https://develop.corosio.cpp.al/[Docs]" with a plain row label
"Docs" so the table's first column is only the label; leave the existing
documentation links in the second and third columns unchanged. Locate the table
row that includes the "[Docs]" link and change that cell content to the literal
text Docs (no link markup) ensuring the other cells in the same <row> remain
intact.
- Line 40: Replace the Markdown-style link in the README.adoc line containing
"(See accompanying file [LICENSE_1_0.txt](LICENSE_1_0.txt) or copy at" with
AsciiDoc link syntax by converting the [text](url) form into the AsciiDoc
link:url[text] form so the license link renders correctly in AsciiDoc.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.adoc (1)

16-16: Remove extra blank line for consistency.

There's an extra blank line here (two consecutive empty lines) while other rows are separated by a single blank line. This creates formatting inconsistency in the table structure.

♻️ Proposed fix
-
-
+
 |https://drone.io/[Drone]

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link

cppalliance-bot commented Jan 20, 2026

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://35.corosio.prtest3.cppalliance.org/index.html

If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL.

2026-01-20 13:17:55 UTC

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants