Repository navigation
docs: add a page about Gitea, Forgejo and GitLab support - #569
Merged
Merged
Conversation
List how the git server is detected, which token is read, which feedback features work on each server, and the differences to GitHub.
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 37 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
2bndy5
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
git-bot-feedback 0.12.1 gives cpp-linter clients for Gitea, Forgejo and GitLab, but the docs only talk about GitHub. This adds one page, "Supported Git Servers" (after "Permissions" in the nav), with:
Docs only, plus
forgejoin the cspell words.mkdocs build --strictand pre-commit pass.What I tested
I ran cpp-linter against real servers before writing the page. The CI environment variables were set by hand on a normal machine (no Gitea runner or GitLab Runner was involved), with the pull request payload taken from the server's own API.
Gitea 28.3.0 (local instance,
mainat d26b5fe, clang 18, token of a collaborator with write access):--no-lgtmMust be repo admin(logged as an error, exit code 0), so the review that requested changes stays--no-lgtm=falseGITEA_TOKENGitLab 19.6.0-pre (gitlab.com, private project, release binary 2.0.0-rc.25, clang 18, personal access token):
--no-lgtm=falseGITLAB_TOKENNot tested: Forgejo on a real server (that section follows git-bot-feedback's README, I only checked that
FORGEJO_ACTIONSandFORGEJO_TOKENselect the client and authenticate), and the two CI examples under a real runner. TheGITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITEA_TOKEN }}line in particular is from Gitea's docs, not from a run. Tell me if you would rather leave the examples out.Things I noticed on the way
Not part of this PR. I list them so they are not lost, and can file or fix whichever you want:
--no-lgtm=falseor--passive-reviewsfor now.--step-summarydoes nothing without saying so, and--file-annotationsprints each annotation as a debug struct. The page says to turn annotations off there.--thread-commentsand--files-changed-onlyonly mentionsGITHUB_TOKEN.