Skip to content

fix: bump 8 deps and add 2 overrides to resolve Snyk vulnerabilities - #69

Open
cs-raj wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/snyk-patch-deps-20260810
Open

fix: bump 8 deps and add 2 overrides to resolve Snyk vulnerabilities#69
cs-raj wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/snyk-patch-deps-20260810

Conversation

@cs-raj

@cs-raj cs-raj commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumped 8 direct dependencies (patch + minor, no breaking changes)
  • Added 2 overrides to pin vulnerable transitive deps
  • Bumped package version 1.1.4 → 1.1.5

Dependency Changes

Package Section Before After
debug dependencies ^4.3.5 ^4.4.3
@types/basic-auth devDependencies ^1.1.2 ^1.1.8
@types/node devDependencies ^10.12.2 ^10.17.60
jest devDependencies ^29.0.3 ^29.7.0
rimraf devDependencies ^2.6.2 ^2.7.1
supertest devDependencies ^3.3.0 ^3.4.2
typescript devDependencies ^4.2.0 ^4.9.5
winston devDependencies ^3.1.0 ^3.19.0

Overrides Added (transitive HIGH vulns)

Package Vulnerable Range Pinned To CVE / Issue
brace-expansion <=1.1.17 1.1.18 DoS via unbounded expansion (OOM crash)
js-yaml 3.0.0 - 3.15.0 3.15.1 Quadratic CPU consumption — CVE-2026-59870

Before vs After

Severity Before After Fixed
HIGH 2 0 ✓ 2
Moderate 0 0
Low 0 0

npm audit: clean ✅ Snyk SCA: clean ✅

Remaining Snyk Code findings (not fixed by dep updates — static analysis)

Severity Finding
MEDIUM http.createServer cleartext transmission (×2) — intentional, tracked in DX-9946, to be suppressed via .snyk ignore
HIGH Hardcoded secret in migration file
LOW Hardcoded secrets in test files (×2)

Build

No build script present — library package, build verification not applicable.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Direct dep upgrades:
  - debug: ^4.3.5 → ^4.4.3
  - @types/basic-auth: ^1.1.2 → ^1.1.8
  - @types/node: ^10.12.2 → ^10.17.60
  - jest: ^29.0.3 → ^29.7.0
  - rimraf: ^2.6.2 → ^2.7.1
  - supertest: ^3.3.0 → ^3.4.2
  - typescript: ^4.2.0 → ^4.9.5
  - winston: ^3.1.0 → ^3.19.0

Overrides added (transitive HIGH vulns):
  - brace-expansion: pinned to 1.1.18 (DoS via unbounded expansion)
  - js-yaml: pinned to 3.15.1 (quadratic CPU CVE-2026-59870)

Package version: 1.1.4 → 1.1.5
Vuln count: 2 HIGH (before) → 0 (after). No build script (library package).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cs-raj
cs-raj requested a review from a team as a code owner August 10, 2026 06:31
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@cs-raj cs-raj closed this Aug 10, 2026
@cs-raj cs-raj reopened this Aug 10, 2026
@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

1 similar comment
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants