Stop the roadmap denying the schedule it now carries (#830 follow-up) - #847
Merged
OffgridwithJD merged 1 commit intoAug 29, 2026
Conversation
Three sentences, all true before commandprompt#830 and false after it. Raised in review there; landing them separately so the release is not held on a branch edit. docs/roadmap.md said "It is not a commitment, and it is not a schedule" on a page whose own commit subject is "publish the schedule". The commitment half was already guarded by "Dates are a cadence, not a commitment"; the schedule half was not, and it was the last thing the reader was told. docs/roadmap.md said "Nothing here is committed to a release" above a table whose only row is commandprompt#752, which the release table dates to 1.0-alpha5. The collision is the assignment rather than the dates, so the sentence now points at that table instead of contradicting it. design/RELEASE_PLAN_1.0.md said "The tracker holds seven open issues". It held eight within hours of that being written. The ratio it is making a point about, that exactly one is a feature, is still true and is what the sentence was for, so the total is dropped and the ratio kept. A hard count in a hand-maintained file is true on the day and wrong the week after, and the total is a `gh issue list` away. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KL9BxvtjERL34H1XV8BND2
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three sentences, all true before #830 and false after it. I raised them in review
there; landing them separately because pushing to a branch in this repository is not
something I will do without being asked, and alpha3 is cut on Monday.
The three
docs/roadmap.mdsaid, as the last thing on the page:on a page whose own commit subject is publish the schedule. The commitment half was
already guarded by "Dates are a cadence, not a commitment". The schedule half was not.
docs/roadmap.mdsaid, opening the Planned section:above a table whose only row is #752, which the release table on the same page dates to
1.0-alpha5. The collision is the assignment, not the dates, so the sentence now pointsat that table instead of contradicting it.
design/RELEASE_PLAN_1.0.mdsaid:It held eight within hours of that being written, two of them mine from the same day.
The ratio it is arguing is still true and is what the sentence is for, so the total is
dropped and the ratio kept. A hard count in a hand-maintained file is true on the day
and wrong the week after, and the total is a
gh issue listaway.Why these were invisible
All three are in lines #830 did not touch. A diff-shaped review cannot see them, and
neither
docs_stylenor the plain-language checker is a consistency checker: bothpassed the contradictory page, correctly. Adding a fact can falsify a distant sentence
without touching it.
Gate
docs_styleis 9 of 9 on this tree, including the em and en dash rule, checked withthe checker rather than by eye. The full matrix (preflight on five majors, suites on
18 and 19) is queued behind the two changelog gates and I will post its result here.
Both files carry zero em or en dashes.