docs(operations): adopter submission form link and TAB reference architecture substitution

[angellk]

Summary

• Links the Adopter Submission Form in the triage checklist and adopter interview section of the DD guide
• Adds guidance that a published TAB Reference Architecture may serve as a replacement for an individual adopter interview

Test plan

• Verify markdown renders correctly
• Confirm form link resolves
• Confirm TAB reference architecture link resolves

[caniszczyk]

I am 120% supportive of this change to get not only more quality reference architecture but to simplify the overall process of moving levels. We need to ensure that the ref archs are high quality, which they usually are AND that the TOC still has the final say on rejecting a refarch if they don't feel it's up to the quality they desire for an adopter interview.

[kevin-wangzefeng]

LGTM, thanks

[brandtkeller]

In support of the TAB Reference Architecture Substitution callout. lgtm.

[kevin-wangzefeng]

I am 120% supportive of this change to get not only more quality reference architecture but to simplify the overall process of moving levels. We need to ensure that the ref archs are high quality, which they usually are AND that the TOC still has the final say on rejecting a refarch if they don't feel it's up to the quality they desire for an adopter interview.

+1 to Chris's point — the TOC should retain final judgment on whether a reference architecture meets the bar of an adopter interview, even when it's published. Also worth being explicit that the reference architecture need to be officially published (not a draft/work-in-progress submission) to qualify as a substitution.