Skip to content

Add Optics to UI Testing - #144

Open
chinmayajha wants to merge 1 commit into
cleder:mainfrom
chinmayajha:add-optics
Open

chinmayajha wants to merge 1 commit into
cleder:mainfrom
chinmayajha:add-optics

Conversation

@chinmayajha

@chinmayajha chinmayajha commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds Optics to UI Testing, in alphabetical order.

It is an Apache-2.0 Python package (optics-framework on PyPI, Python 3.12+) for UI tests on Android, iOS, TV and web apps through Appium, Selenium or Playwright. Tests are CSV/YAML suites or pytest code using the Optics class, and element lookup falls back from XPath to text, OCR and image matching.

Python usage: https://optics-framework.org/docs/create/python

Summary by Sourcery

New Features:

  • Add Optics to the collection of Python UI testing resources.

@semanticdiff-com

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

The README now documents Optics as a keyword-driven UI testing framework, placing it alphabetically among the existing UI testing resources and describing its supported platforms, integrations, test formats, and element lookup behavior.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Adds Optics to the UI testing tools list in alphabetical order.
  • Adds a link to the Optics GitHub repository.
  • Summarizes support for Android, iOS, TV, and web testing via Appium, Selenium, or Playwright.
  • Notes CSV/YAML and pytest usage plus XPath, text, OCR, and image-matching lookup fallback.
README.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@qodo-code-review

qodo-code-review Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

Grey Divider

Sorry, something went wrong

We weren't able to complete the code review on our side. Please try again manually by commenting /agentic_review on this PR.

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary by Qodo

Add Optics to the UI Testing resources

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

Grey Divider

AI Description

• Add Optics to the alphabetized UI Testing resource list.
• Describe its supported platforms, test formats, automation backends, and element-lookup fallbacks.
High-Level Assessment

A concise entry in the existing alphabetized UI Testing list is the appropriate approach; a separate page would add unnecessary structure for one resource.

Files changed (1) +1 / -0

Documentation (1) +1 / -0
README.mdList Optics under UI Testing +1/-0

List Optics under UI Testing

• Adds a link to Optics between LuluTest and pomcorn. The entry summarizes its supported platforms, automation backends, test formats, and element-lookup fallbacks.

README.md

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Sourcery assessment

Approved.


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Oct 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

  • Queue this pull request

@llamapreview llamapreview Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LlamaPReview — Conditional code-review clear

One-line curated-list addition to the README UI Testing section; the entry is well-formed, correctly placed in alphabetical order, and introduces no code, configuration, or runtime surface.

Exact-head CI remains unresolved (1 pending); no CI-dependent merge-safety claim is made.

Review details and evidence

Material unknowns

  • Whether the third-party Optics project's described capabilities (Appium/Selenium/Playwright multi-platform support, CSV/YAML suites, XPath-to-OCR lookup fallback) and its optics-framework PyPI packaging are accurate. If an owner knows the project is not Python-usable, the entry would be misplaced in this list; no supplied evidence shows that, so merge posture is unchanged.
    • Check: Optional, nondeciding: rely on the maintainer's editorial judgment and the linked primary source; no check is needed to merge.

LlamaPReview checks

  • Read the complete PR-head file README.md.

LlamaPReview is open source. Explore the code behind this review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant