fix: include void functions in collection summaries - #21
Merged
dylandreimerink merged 1 commit intoAug 19, 2026
Conversation
Signed-off-by: immanuwell <pchpr.00@list.ru>
dylandreimerink
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2026
dylandreimerink
left a comment
dylandreimerink
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch, thanks again!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Collection summaries skip concrete
voidBPF-to-BPF functions because they have noDW_AT_type.This is a real gotcha since
voidhelpers are normal BPF code, and direct lookup already worksThe fix checks for code addresses or ranges instead. Declaration-only entries stay filtered
Repro:
Before,
helperis missing. After the fix:Tests:
go test -v ./...,go test -race ./...,go vet ./...,golangci-lint run ./...