Skip to content

docs(dns-monitors): document the HTTPS (RFC 9460) record type#397

Merged
sbezludny merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
sergii/dns-https-docs
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

docs(dns-monitors): document the HTTPS (RFC 9460) record type#397
sbezludny merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
sergii/dns-https-docs

Conversation

@sbezludny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Documents the new HTTPS (RFC 9460, DNS type 65 / SVCB) record type for DNS monitors — used to monitor a domain's HTTPS service-binding record (HTTP/3 advertisement via alpn, ipv4hint/ipv6hint, ech).

Changes

  • detect/uptime-monitoring/dns-monitors/overview.mdx — add HTTPS to the supported record types list.
  • detect/uptime-monitoring/dns-monitors/configuration.mdx — add an HTTPS JSON-response accordion and a "Verify a domain advertises HTTP/3" use case; assert alpn contains h3 via a text-answer capture group, plus ipv4hint/ipv6hint present. Includes the substring-precision caveat.
  • constructs/dns-monitor.mdx — add HTTPS to the recordType list (CLI construct reference).

Context

Pairs with the runner/API + webapp support (checkly/monorepo) and the CLI DnsRecordType addition (checkly/checkly-cli #1360).

Add HTTPS to the supported record types and the DnsMonitor construct reference, plus an HTTPS JSON-response accordion and an HTTP/3 monitoring use case in the configuration page (assert alpn contains h3 via a text-answer capture group; ipv4hint/ipv6hint present).
@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
checkly-422f444a 🟢 Ready View Preview Jun 24, 2026, 8:43 AM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

Swap the savearoundtrip.com example for is.checkly.online (a Checkly-owned domain that advertises HTTP/3), matching the page's real-domain examples; use its actual ipv4hint/ipv6hint values.
@sbezludny sbezludny merged commit e12d146 into main Jun 24, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants