Skip to content

Conversation

@mosabua
Copy link
Member

@mosabua mosabua commented Jul 3, 2025

Type of change

What should this PR do?

Provide minimal docs for first iteration that is made available to customers.

Fix https://github.com/chainguard-dev/internal/issues/5106

WIP since this is all in development and refinement for now.

Why are we making this change?

UI without docs is good, but with docs is better.

What are the acceptance criteria?

Documents functionality as it goes live to first customers.

How should this PR be tested?

Verify against the console to confirm the docs reflect the UI.

@mosabua mosabua requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2025 22:55
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Deploy Preview for ornate-narwhal-088216 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9871fae
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/ornate-narwhal-088216/deploys/686ef3f02ea78a0008cec05f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2373--ornate-narwhal-088216.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@mosabua mosabua force-pushed the browse branch 3 times, most recently from d663edf to d51eb54 Compare July 4, 2025 21:13
@mosabua mosabua added the 25d label Jul 4, 2025
`org.springframework:spring-core` or `org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http`.
* **Latest version** - the latest released and available version of the library
and the total number of available versions.
* **Created** - TBD .. not sure what specific date that is, arguably it should
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is "Created" is the date when Chainguard has started building a project (regardless if it's just 1 version, multiple versions). I don't see any issues with keeping this date, but we should have a tooltip or something that explains it.

"Updated" is confusing because I'd expect it would be the date when the latest version of a library was released by Chainguard, but we will often release older versions after later versions based on customer demand.

We may want to get some early customer and SE feedback on what they'd expect. cc @garrying as well for any thoughts

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the point of the created date is its just when we started building some version? Also .. why does it matter when we built it .. if a library is from 3 years ago .. and we started building it yesterday .. what point is there in knowing the date of yesterday? especially in a year .. when we have built numerous other versions ..

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should discuss this with the ecosystem team and the console UI team .. I am not certain that showing any date here is useful .. and if there is maybe "Newest release date of upstream that we have available" and "Date of the most recent build from Chainguard for whatever version..including backfilling and old one" .. but maybe both of these should NOT be on this page but just standard fields for each version on the page for a specific library

Signed-off-by : Manfred Moser <manfred@simpligility.ca>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants