-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Component hostcall optimizations #13876
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tschneidereit
wants to merge
8
commits into
bytecodealliance:main
Choose a base branch
from
tschneidereit:hostcall-opts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
13a065d
Split current_thread into an inline fast path and a cold slow path
tschneidereit 3336665
Skip resource-borrow scope tracking for borrow-free signatures
tschneidereit 4d50079
Defer HostTask creation for sync-lowered borrow-free host calls
tschneidereit e4cfb5f
Skip scope resolution in LiftContext if possible
tschneidereit 0efaf65
Elide HostTask + JoinHandle for ready async-lowered host calls
tschneidereit 0d618b0
Add fast path for immediately-ready results to `call_async_lower`
tschneidereit 118e483
cargo fmt fixes
tschneidereit 8da58dc
Fix CI failures
tschneidereit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[kinda unrelated to runtime optimizations]
first_pollcurrently causes a lot of llvm-lines bloat and compile-time overhead.Do you think it could be reduced by changing generic
RtoBox<dyn Any + Send + 'static>?Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = Box<dyn Any + Send + 'static>> + Send + 'static>>There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Who knows, maybe? But we'd most certainly have very very compelling evidence that that change doesn't negatively impact runtime performance. Which absent that evidence I would think to be somewhat likely, since it'd introduce a box and a virtual call at a very hot callsite.
This is important to keep in mind for your entire work around reducing the amount of LLVM IR generated: we'd be unlikely to give up even a tiny bit of runtime performance for all but the most massive compile time gains, if at all.