fix(content-explorer): Validate selected item ids after item changes#4268
fix(content-explorer): Validate selected item ids after item changes#4268mergify[bot] merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughI pity the fool who loses selection—this change adds an internal method to validate and reconcile Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant U as User / External Trigger
participant CE as ContentExplorer
participant V as validateSelectedItemIds
rect rgb(245,248,255)
note over CE: Collection / metadata update flow
U->>CE: Trigger item update or metadata query
CE->>CE: Update currentCollection.items (newCollection/items)
CE->>V: validateSelectedItemIds(items)
alt selection = 'all' or empty
V-->>CE: short-circuit (no change)
else
V-->>CE: compute intersection, update selectedItemIds if different
end
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/elements/content-explorer/ContentExplorer.tsx (1)
1075-1083: Don’t useas constonnewCollectionwhen you mutate it, fool.
as constmakes props effectively readonly and can cause TS errors when assigningnewCollection.items = …. Remove it.- const newCollection = { ...currentCollection } as const; + const newCollection = { ...currentCollection }; newCollection.items = items.map(item => (item.id === newItem.id ? newItem : item)); this.validateSelectedItemIds(newCollection.items);
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/elements/content-explorer/ContentExplorer.tsx (1)
8-8: Drop the extra baggage, fool — consider ditchinglodash/isEqualfor Set equality.A tiny helper to compare two Sets saves bytes and avoids another import. Not blocking.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is disabled
- Jira integration is disabled
- Linear integration is disabled
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/elements/content-explorer/ContentExplorer.tsx(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: lint_test_build
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/elements/content-explorer/ContentExplorer.tsx (2)
428-429: Right call to validate after metadata query results.Keeps selection honest with the latest items. I like it.
1739-1739: Nice: revalidating selection after metadata edits.Prevents stale IDs hanging around. That’s tight.
…ox#4268) Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit