-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
chore(deps): upgrade rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0
#85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): upgrade rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0
#85
Conversation
7efa061 to
ec73101
Compare
ec73101 to
97479dd
Compare
rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0
2743a8a to
3ca6715
Compare
|
FWIW the PR description is stale, all the upgrades upto and including |
|
Thanks! LGTM, just need to remove the patches after I get |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9287739329Details
💛 - Coveralls |
|
I just published |
3ca6715 to
81b4695
Compare
|
The |
81b4695 to
6836628
Compare
Great! I removed the patch, reworded the commit and the description, should be ready to go now. |
notmandatory
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 6836628
…ipt` to `0.12.0` and others 1120081 chore(wallet): rm dup code (志宇) 2a45640 deps(bdk): bump `bitcoin` to `0.32.0`, miniscript to `12.0.0` (Leonardo Lima) Pull request description: fixes #1422 <!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. --> ### Description This PR focuses on upgrading the `rust-bitcoin` and `miniscript` versions, to `0.32.0` and `0.12.0`, respectively. It also bumps the versions of other BDK ecosystem crates that also rely on both `rust-bitcoin` and `miniscript`, being: - electrum-client bitcoindevkit/rust-electrum-client#133 - esplora-client bitcoindevkit/rust-esplora-client#85 - hwi bitcoindevkit/rust-hwi#99 <ins>I structured the PR in multiple commits, with closed scope, being one for each BDK crate being upgraded, and one for each kind of fix and upgrade required, it seems like a lot of commits (**that should be squashed before merging**), but I think it'll make it easier during review phase.</ins> In summary I can already mention some of the main changes: - using `compute_txid()` instead of deprecated `txid()` - using `minimal_non_dust()` instead of `dust_value()` - using the renamed `signature` and `sighash_type` fields - using proper `sighash::P2wpkhError`, `sighash::TaprootError` instead of older `sighash::Error` - conversion from `Network` to new expected `NetworkKind` #1465 - conversion from the new `Weight` type to current expected `usize` #1466 - using `.into()` to convert from AbsLockTime and `RelLockTime` to `absolute::LockTime` and `relative::LockTime` - using Message::from_digest() instead of relying on deprecated `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait. - updating the miniscript policy and dsl to proper expect and handle new `Threshold` type, instead of the previous two parameters. <!-- Describe the purpose of this PR, what's being adding and/or fixed --> ### Notes to the reviewers <ins>Again, I structured the PR in multiple commits, with closed scope, being one for each BDK crate being upgraded, and one for each kind of fix and upgrade required, it seems like a lot of commits (**that should be squashed before merging**), but I think it'll make it easier during review phase.</ins> It should definitely be carefully reviewed, especially the last commits for the wallet crate scope, the ones with the semantic `fix(wallet)`. I would also appreciate if @tcharding reviewed it, as he gave a try in the past (#1400 ), and I relied on some of it for the policy part of it, other rust-bitcoin maintainers reviews are a definitely welcome 😁 <!-- In this section you can include notes directed to the reviewers, like explaining why some parts of the PR were done in a specific way --> ### Changelog notice > // TODO(@oleonardolima): Do another pass and double check the changes - Use `compute_txid()` instead of deprecated `txid()` - Use `minimal_non_dust()` instead of `dust_value()` - Use `signature` and `sighash_type` fields, instead of previous `sig` and `hash_type` - Use `sighash::P2wpkhError`, and `sighash::TaprootError` instead of older `sighash::Error` - Converts from `Network` to `NetworkKind`, where expected - Converts from `Weight` type to current used `usize` - Use `.into()` to convert from `AbsLockTime` and `RelLockTime` to `absolute::LockTime` and `relative::LockTime` - Remove use of deprecated `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait, use `Message::from_digest()` - Update the miniscript policy and dsl macros to proper expect and handle new `Threshold` type, instead of the previous two parameters. <!-- Notice the release manager should include in the release tag message changelog --> <!-- See https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ for examples --> ### Checklists #### All Submissions: * [x] I've signed all my commits * [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) * [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing #### New Features: * [ ] I've added tests for the new feature * [ ] I've added docs for the new feature #### Bugfixes: * [ ] This pull request breaks the existing API * [ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing * [ ] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR ACKs for top commit: notmandatory: ACK 1120081 Tree-SHA512: ba1ab64603b41014d3f0866d846167f77d31959ca6f1d9c3181d5e543964f5d772e05651d63935ba7bbffeba41a66868d27de4c32129739b9ca50f3bbaf9f2a1
…t-bitcoin` to `0.32.0` 6836628f8d0da3b39256d15f6dc7d113d6bdb49e deps: bump crate version to 0.8.0 (Leonardo Lima) 04f4b349f7b26a6963faf8417a8ad7bd4e720510 chore(deps): upgrade `rust-bitcoin` to `0.32.0` and electrsd to `0.28.0` (Leonardo Lima) Pull request description: <!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. --> `partially fixes` [#1422](bitcoindevkit/bdk#1422) ### Description It updates the rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0, the `bitcoin`crate dependency and `electrsd` to `0.28.0`. _NOTE: The overall BDK update to `0.32.0` still requires and depends on some other crates, please refer to [#1422](bitcoindevkit/bdk#1422 <!-- Describe the purpose of this PR, what's being adding and/or fixed --> ### Notes to the reviewers It's open for any comments. <!-- In this section you can include notes directed to the reviewers, like explaining why some parts of the PR were done in a specific way --> ### Changelog notice - Update the `bitcoin` crate dependency to `0.32.0` - Update the `electrsd` crate dependency to `0.28.0` <!-- Notice the release manager should include in the release tag message changelog --> <!-- See https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ for examples --> ### Checklists #### All Submissions: * [x] I've signed all my commits * [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) * [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing #### New Features: * [ ] I've added tests for the new feature * [ ] I've added docs for the new feature #### Bugfixes: * [ ] This pull request breaks the existing API * [ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing * [ ] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR ACKs for top commit: notmandatory: ACK 6836628f8d0da3b39256d15f6dc7d113d6bdb49e Tree-SHA512: 660f2f528de6921b111b412514b6a0cc402fac59eefc9a8514f76847adad077d493275e2c4465ad43ac6f214372a57a892de0ebbb809395672f31b46d590ae10
partially fixes#1422Description
It updates the rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0, the
bitcoincrate dependency andelectrsdto0.28.0.NOTE: The overall BDK update to
0.32.0still requires and depends on some other crates, please refer to #1422.Notes to the reviewers
It's open for any comments.
Changelog notice
bitcoincrate dependency to0.32.0electrsdcrate dependency to0.28.0Checklists
All Submissions:
cargo fmtandcargo clippybefore committingNew Features:
Bugfixes: