chore(sql): remove the superseded manual update scripts 01-22

[aglinxinyuan]

What changes were proposed in this PR?

Deletes sql/updates/01.sql through 22.sql, which sit outside the applied migration chain — nothing in the repository can execute them. Pure deletion, no behaviour change: −989 lines.

The chain is defined solely by sql/changelog.xml, whose live changesets are 23-37. Its only mention of a lower number is sql/updates/1.sql, inside an <!-- example changeSet --> comment — and no such file exists, since the real ones are zero-padded. Neither bootstrap path needs the deleted files:

fresh DB      -> sql/texera_ddl.sql (one-time bootstrap, already the post-migration shape)
existing DB   -> already past changeset 23, so 01-22 ran long ago

Every runner was checked against that:

Runner	Why 01-22 are unreachable
sql/docker-compose.yml	liquibase runs --changeLogFile=changelog.xml; the updates/*.sql loop only sed-normalizes files into /tmp, and its glob still matches 23-37
bin/local-dev/main.sh	parse_changelog_changesets skips XML comments and applies only referenced changesets
bin/single-node/docker-compose.yml	mounts sql/ into /docker-entrypoint-initdb.d; the postgres entrypoint does not recurse into updates/
.github/workflows/automatic-email-notif-on-ddl-change.yml	diffs with --diff-filter=A (added only), so deletions are inert

Reviewer note — one judgement call worth flagging. These are the historical manual-upgrade scripts operators were emailed about. An operator still running a pre-changeset-23 database would lose the only in-tree copy; it stays recoverable from git history, but is no longer browsable in the tree. Happy to add a short sql/updates/README.md breadcrumb pointing at the history if that is preferred — I kept this PR a pure deletion.

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

Closes #7702

How was this PR tested?

Existing tests only — this PR removes files that no runner executes.

From the repo root:

• bash bin/local-dev/tests/test_local_dev_sh.sh — 114 passed, including the two that guard this exact contract:

  • changelog parser: 15 changesets, commented example skipped
  • changelog: every referenced sql/updates file exists

  Its 3 failures (worktree pointer, listen_pid_for_port, install cmd: java via brew) are pre-existing on this Windows machine — confirmed identical with the deletion stashed, and caused by the absence of lsof/ss/brew rather than by this change.

Verification, re-runnable by a reviewer:

grep -oE 'sql/updates/[0-9]+\.sql' sql/changelog.xml | sort -V   # 1(commented) + 23..37 only
for n in $(seq -w 1 22); do git grep -l "$n\.sql" -- . ':!sql/updates'; done   # no hits

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 5)

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[github-actions]

Automated Reviewer Suggestions

Based on the git blame history of the changed files, we recommend the following reviewers:

• No candidates found from git blame history.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.93%. Comparing base (1c4662b) to head (621a2ef).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7703      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     90.93%   90.93%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     4450     4449       -1     
============================================
  Files          1174     1174              
  Lines         47139    47139              
  Branches       5284     5284              
============================================
- Hits          42867    42865       -2     
- Misses         2579     2580       +1     
- Partials       1693     1694       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
access-control-service	81.00% <ø> (ø)
agent-service	98.62% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 1c4662b
amber	87.38% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
computing-unit-managing-service	73.67% <ø> (ø)
config-service	86.73% <ø> (ø)
file-service	68.90% <ø> (ø)
frontend	92.43% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 1c4662b
notebook-migration-service	83.74% <ø> (ø)
pyamber	97.57% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 1c4662b
workflow-compiling-service	77.19% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

✅ No material benchmark regressions detected

🟢 2 better · 🔴 0 worse · ⚪ 13 noise (<±5%) · 0 without baseline

Compared against main 1c4662b benchmarked on this same runner, so the delta is largely free of cross-runner hardware noise. The "7d avg" column still reflects the gh-pages dashboard. Treat <±5% as noise unless repeated.

Dashboard · Run

	config	throughput	MB/s	latency	max Δ latest / 7d
⚪	bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	395	0.241	24,956/33,851/33,851 us	⚪ within ±5% / 🔴 +109.4%
🟢	bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	803	0.49	123,571/146,241/146,241 us	🟢 -6.0% / 🔴 +38.5%
⚪	bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	909	0.555	1,098,300/1,140,381/1,140,381 us	⚪ within ±5% / 🔴 -14.0%

Baseline details

Latest main 1c4662b from same runner

config	metric	PR	latest main	7d avg	Δ latest	Δ 7d
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	throughput	395 tuples/sec	405 tuples/sec	784.16 tuples/sec	-2.5%	-49.6%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	MB/s	0.241 MB/s	0.247 MB/s	0.479 MB/s	-2.4%	-49.6%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	p50	24,956 us	25,177 us	12,626 us	-0.9%	+97.6%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	p95	33,851 us	34,510 us	16,169 us	-1.9%	+109.4%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	p99	33,851 us	34,510 us	18,986 us	-1.9%	+78.3%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	throughput	803 tuples/sec	823 tuples/sec	1,023 tuples/sec	-2.4%	-21.5%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	MB/s	0.49 MB/s	0.502 MB/s	0.625 MB/s	-2.4%	-21.6%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	p50	123,571 us	119,569 us	99,185 us	+3.3%	+24.6%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	p95	146,241 us	155,506 us	105,616 us	-6.0%	+38.5%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	p99	146,241 us	155,506 us	113,681 us	-6.0%	+28.6%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	throughput	909 tuples/sec	918 tuples/sec	1,057 tuples/sec	-1.0%	-14.0%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	MB/s	0.555 MB/s	0.56 MB/s	0.645 MB/s	-0.9%	-13.9%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	p50	1,098,300 us	1,087,306 us	965,435 us	+1.0%	+13.8%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	p95	1,140,381 us	1,117,128 us	1,012,135 us	+2.1%	+12.7%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	p99	1,140,381 us	1,117,128 us	1,042,088 us	+2.1%	+9.4%

Raw CSV

config_idx,batch_size,schema_width,string_len,num_batches,total_ms,total_tuples,total_bytes,tuples_per_sec,mb_per_sec,lat_p50_us,lat_p95_us,lat_p99_us
0,10,10,64,20,506.57,200,128000,395,0.241,24955.74,33851.36,33851.36
1,100,10,64,20,2489.55,2000,1280000,803,0.490,123571.15,146240.82,146240.82
2,1000,10,64,20,21999.26,20000,12800000,909,0.555,1098299.95,1140380.65,1140380.65