-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Incremental snapshot thin client ordering problem #13178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
| * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
| * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
| * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
| * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
| * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| * | ||
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
| * limitations under the License. | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| package org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.snapshot.incremental; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
| import java.util.Arrays; | ||
| import java.util.Collections; | ||
| import java.util.HashSet; | ||
| import java.util.List; | ||
| import java.util.Set; | ||
| import java.util.UUID; | ||
| import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.cache.affinity.AffinityFunction; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.cache.affinity.AffinityFunctionContext; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.client.ClientCache; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.client.ClientTransaction; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.client.IgniteClient; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.Ignition; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.cluster.ClusterNode; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.cluster.ClusterState; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.configuration.ClientConfiguration; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.configuration.IgniteConfiguration; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.internal.cluster.NodeOrderComparator; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.discovery.CustomMessageWrapper; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.internal.util.distributed.InitMessage; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.internal.util.typedef.internal.U; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.lang.IgniteFuture; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.TcpDiscoverySpi; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.messages.TcpDiscoveryAbstractMessage; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.messages.TcpDiscoveryCustomEventMessage; | ||
| import org.apache.ignite.testframework.GridTestUtils; | ||
| import org.junit.Test; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.snapshot.AbstractSnapshotSelfTest.snp; | ||
| import static org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.odbc.ClientListenerProcessor.CLIENT_LISTENER_PORT; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Test reproducing transaction ordering violation during incremental snapshot with thin client. | ||
| */ | ||
| public class IncrementalSnapshotOrderingTest extends AbstractIncrementalSnapshotTest { | ||
| /** Latch to block InitMessage on nodes 2 and 3. */ | ||
| private static volatile CountDownLatch blockInitMsgLatch; | ||
|
|
||
| /** Node indices where InitMessage is blocked. */ | ||
| private static final Set<Integer> BLOCKED_NODES = new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(2, 3)); | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override protected IgniteConfiguration getConfiguration(String instanceName) throws Exception { | ||
| IgniteConfiguration cfg = super.getConfiguration(instanceName); | ||
|
|
||
| CacheConfiguration<Integer, Integer> cacheCfg = cacheConfiguration(CACHE); | ||
| cacheCfg.setAffinity(new SimpleAffinity()); | ||
| cfg.setCacheConfiguration(cacheCfg); | ||
|
|
||
| int nodeIdx = getTestIgniteInstanceIndex(instanceName); | ||
| if (BLOCKED_NODES.contains(nodeIdx)) { | ||
| cfg.setDiscoverySpi(new BlockingInitMessageDiscoverySpi() | ||
| .setIpFinder(((TcpDiscoverySpi)cfg.getDiscoverySpi()).getIpFinder())); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return cfg; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override protected void beforeTest() throws Exception { | ||
| cleanPersistenceDir(); | ||
|
|
||
| startGrids(nodes()); | ||
|
|
||
| grid(0).cluster().state(ClusterState.ACTIVE); | ||
|
|
||
| grid(0).snapshot().createSnapshot(SNP).get(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override protected void afterTest() throws Exception { | ||
| blockInitMsgLatch = null; | ||
| super.afterTest(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override protected int nodes() { | ||
| return 4; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override protected int backups() { | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Reproduces the ordering violation. | ||
| */ | ||
| @Test | ||
| public void testIncrementalSnapshotOrderingProblem() throws Exception { | ||
| blockInitMsgLatch = new CountDownLatch(1); | ||
|
|
||
| IgniteFuture<Void> snpFut = grid(0).snapshot().createIncrementalSnapshot(SNP); | ||
|
|
||
| boolean started = GridTestUtils.waitForCondition(() -> { | ||
| UUID id = snp(grid(0)).incrementalSnapshotId(); | ||
| return id != null; | ||
| }, 10_000); | ||
| assertTrue("Snapshot did not start on node 0", started); | ||
|
|
||
| int clientPort = grid(0).localNode().<Integer>attribute(CLIENT_LISTENER_PORT); | ||
| ClientConfiguration clientCfg = new ClientConfiguration() | ||
| .setAddresses("127.0.0.1:" + clientPort); | ||
|
|
||
| try (IgniteClient thinClient = Ignition.startClient(clientCfg)) { | ||
| ClientCache<Integer, Integer> cache = thinClient.cache(CACHE); | ||
|
|
||
| try (ClientTransaction tx = thinClient.transactions().txStart()) { | ||
| cache.put(1, 100); | ||
| cache.put(2, 200); | ||
| tx.commit(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| try (ClientTransaction tx = thinClient.transactions().txStart()) { | ||
| cache.put(3, 300); | ||
| cache.put(4, 400); | ||
| tx.commit(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| assertTrue("Snapshot started on node 2 prematurely", snp(grid(2)).incrementalSnapshotId() == null); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sometimes your test fails here. For a clean reproducer you must guarantee that the test passes this condition. Tip: go deeper to the |
||
| blockInitMsgLatch.countDown(); | ||
|
|
||
| snpFut.get(getTestTimeout()); | ||
|
|
||
| restartWithCleanPersistence(nodes(), Collections.singletonList(CACHE)); | ||
| grid(0).snapshot().restoreSnapshot(SNP, null, 1).get(getTestTimeout()); | ||
|
|
||
| Integer val1 = (Integer)grid(0).cache(CACHE).get(1); | ||
| Integer val3 = (Integer)grid(2).cache(CACHE).get(3); | ||
|
|
||
| if (val1 == null && val3 != null) { | ||
| fail("Incremental snapshot ordering violation detected: " + | ||
| "tx1 is missing (should be present as it was committed before tx2), " + | ||
| "but tx2 (key3=" + val3 + ") is present."); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Misleading log - key3 = val3 |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** Discovery SPI that blocks InitMessage processing on certain nodes. */ | ||
| private static class BlockingInitMessageDiscoverySpi extends TcpDiscoverySpi { | ||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override protected void startMessageProcess(TcpDiscoveryAbstractMessage msg) { | ||
| if (msg instanceof TcpDiscoveryCustomEventMessage && blockInitMsgLatch != null) { | ||
| TcpDiscoveryCustomEventMessage m = (TcpDiscoveryCustomEventMessage)msg; | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| CustomMessageWrapper m0 = (CustomMessageWrapper)m.message( | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This doesn't compile |
||
| marshaller(), U.resolveClassLoader(ignite().configuration())); | ||
|
|
||
| if (m0.delegate() instanceof InitMessage) { | ||
| try { | ||
| blockInitMsgLatch.await(); | ||
| } catch (InterruptedException e) { | ||
| Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); | ||
| throw new RuntimeException(e); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Throwable ignored) { | ||
| // No-op | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| super.startMessageProcess(msg); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** Simple affinity mapping key N to node N-1. */ | ||
| private static class SimpleAffinity implements AffinityFunction { | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Please, use GridCommonAbstractTest#keyForNode instead - it will make the test more user friendly for a reviewer |
||
| /** Serial version uid. */ | ||
| private static final long serialVersionUID = 0L; | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override public void reset() { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override public int partitions() { | ||
| return 4; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override public int partition(Object key) { | ||
| if (key instanceof Integer) { | ||
| int k = (Integer)key; | ||
| // Key 1 → partition 0, 2 → 1, 3 → 2, 4 → 3. | ||
| return (k - 1) % partitions(); | ||
| } | ||
| return Math.abs(key.hashCode() % partitions()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override public List<List<ClusterNode>> assignPartitions(AffinityFunctionContext affCtx) { | ||
| List<ClusterNode> nodes = new ArrayList<>(affCtx.currentTopologySnapshot()); | ||
| nodes.sort(NodeOrderComparator.getInstance()); | ||
|
|
||
| List<List<ClusterNode>> result = new ArrayList<>(partitions()); | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < partitions(); i++) | ||
| result.add(Collections.singletonList(nodes.get(i % nodes.size()))); | ||
|
|
||
| return result; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** {@inheritDoc} */ | ||
| @Override public void removeNode(UUID nodeId) { | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you need 4 nodes, why 2 is not enough?