Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](be) Validate task executor scan handles #65054#65074

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-65054-branch-4.1
Open

branch-4.1: [fix](be) Validate task executor scan handles #65054#65074
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-65054-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #65054

Task-executor scan scheduling could pass a null or
invalid task handle into TimeSharingTaskExecutor. enqueue_splits and
related paths cast the base TaskHandle to TimeSharingTaskHandle and
immediately dereferenced the result, so a broken ScannerContext
task-handle invariant caused BE to crash with SIGSEGV instead of
returning a diagnostic error. This change validates scanner context,
scan task, and task handle before submitting scan splits, and validates
the task handle type at TimeSharingTaskExecutor entry points before
dereferencing it.
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner July 1, 2026 06:19
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants