-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
feat: add GroupColumn support for Decimal256 in multi-column GROUP BY #23849
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tohuya6
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
tohuya6:feat-22715-decimal256-group-column
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+182
−10
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2327,6 +2327,39 @@ statement ok | |
| DROP TABLE approx_distinct_interval_test; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # GROUP BY over Decimal256 group keys. Decimal256 columns route through the | ||
| # GroupValuesColumn column-wise fast path (like Decimal128), so a Decimal256 key | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this is a bunch of implementation detail -- I think the comment can just focus on what it is testing (aka Decimal256 keys) The rest is likely irrelevant |
||
| # no longer forces the row-encoded fallback. Equal decimals collapse and a | ||
| # Decimal256 key groups alongside a primitive on the multi-column path. Queries | ||
| # project only the INT counts / keys so the expected output does not depend on | ||
| # decimal Display formatting. | ||
| statement ok | ||
| CREATE TABLE decimal256_group_test AS VALUES | ||
| (1, arrow_cast(100, 'Decimal256(20, 2)')), | ||
| (1, arrow_cast(100, 'Decimal256(20, 2)')), | ||
| (1, arrow_cast(250, 'Decimal256(20, 2)')), | ||
| (2, arrow_cast(100, 'Decimal256(20, 2)')); | ||
|
|
||
| # Single Decimal256 group key: {100.00, 250.00}, with 100.00 appearing three times. | ||
| query I | ||
| SELECT count(*) FROM decimal256_group_test GROUP BY column2 ORDER BY count(*); | ||
| ---- | ||
| 1 | ||
| 3 | ||
|
|
||
| # Multi-column GROUP BY: a primitive key and a Decimal256 key on the same path. | ||
| query II | ||
| SELECT column1, count(*) | ||
| FROM decimal256_group_test GROUP BY column1, column2 ORDER BY column1, count(*); | ||
| ---- | ||
| 1 1 | ||
| 1 2 | ||
| 2 1 | ||
|
|
||
| statement ok | ||
| DROP TABLE decimal256_group_test; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## This test executes the APPROX_PERCENTILE_CONT aggregation against the test | ||
| ## data, asserting the estimated quantiles are ±5% their actual values. | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this add additional coverage compared to the slt test? I feel like it is a lot of new tests for a single line code change that just instantiates a new accumulator.
In other words, think just the end to end test is enough 🤔