-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
CASSANDRA-21458 Update serializers to allow comparison between two LET variables #4879
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
alanwang67
wants to merge
16
commits into
apache:trunk
Choose a base branch
from
alanwang67:serialization
base: trunk
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aeff029
added support for LET comparisons
alanwang67 473035c
tests
alanwang67 50cb0dc
removed test
alanwang67 b0a9033
add missing line
alanwang67 8672edf
update
alanwang67 f34462b
add additional checks to prepare
alanwang67 1008bf2
remove unused param
alanwang67 0982a86
remove duplication of kind
alanwang67 f4f11c4
update comment
alanwang67 257a6b1
updated tests
alanwang67 4264231
changed exception thronw
alanwang67 e7fd97d
remove dead code
alanwang67 cb12252
fixed bugs
alanwang67 f3d2d72
map test
alanwang67 5e66e09
fix
alanwang67 5b6844d
move type comparison
alanwang67 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this isn't correct; there is a reason why Value doesn't do this as this is just SimpleBounds.
row1.foo.barandrow1.foo['key']are not correct I believeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the above is actually the following in your code
as the toByteBuffer takes all complex types and returns the top level type, and not what is actually referenced