Skip to content

chore: bump dev tooling (@types/node, knip, lefthook, typescript-eslint) - #81

Closed
vvillait88 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/dep-sweep-dev-tooling
Closed

chore: bump dev tooling (@types/node, knip, lefthook, typescript-eslint)#81
vvillait88 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/dep-sweep-dev-tooling

Conversation

@vvillait88

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Routine dependency sweep, dev-tooling only, all within existing caret ranges: @types/node 26.2.0 to 26.4.0, knip 6.32.2 to 6.33.0, lefthook 2.1.10 to 2.1.12, typescript-eslint 8.67.0 to 8.68.0. No runtime dependency changed. Held per the dependency registry and deliberately left in place: eslint (^9, org-wide hold on v10), typescript (^6, org-wide hold on v7). No release, since dev-only changes reach no consumer.

Worked with: Varun.

Type of change

  • Docs, tests, or internal maintenance only

Public API

None.

Test plan

bun run lint, bun run typecheck, bun run knip, and bun run test (166 passed / 9 skipped) all green after a clean reconcile install.

Checklist

  • Tests cover the new behavior, and the suite passes locally
  • Lint, format, and type checks pass
  • Docs and README examples updated if the public surface changed
  • No secrets, credentials, or personal data in the diff or the tests

Routine dependency sweep, dev-only bumps within their existing ranges:
@types/node 26.2.0 to 26.4.0, knip 6.32.2 to 6.33.0, lefthook 2.1.10 to
2.1.12, typescript-eslint 8.67.0 to 8.68.0. No runtime dependency changed, so
no release. Held per the registry and left in place: eslint (^9), typescript
(^6).
@vvillait88

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of Dependabot #80, which bumps the same four dev-tooling packages (@types/node, knip, lefthook, typescript-eslint) as the routine minor-patch group. No need for a hand-authored duplicate.

@vvillait88 vvillait88 closed this Aug 31, 2026
@vvillait88
vvillait88 deleted the chore/dep-sweep-dev-tooling branch August 31, 2026 19:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant