Repository navigation
Build/Test Tools: Run the post list E2E specs in parallel. #15901
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
adimoldovan
wants to merge
5
commits into
WordPress:trunk
Choose a base branch
from
adimoldovan:e2e/post-list-parallel
base: trunk
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d131d3e
Build/Test Tools: Run the post list E2E specs in parallel.
adimoldovan d58be3e
Build/Test Tools: Delete all of a fixture user's posts, not only the …
adimoldovan 3d57516
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/trunk' into e2e/post-list-para…
adimoldovan 6ff1422
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/trunk' into e2e/post-list-para…
adimoldovan 55eb096
Build/Test Tools: Name the empty post list E2E test after its search.
adimoldovan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you identify an existing test affected by the saved drafts left in trash, or separate this broader cleanup from the parallelization change?
I ran the existing Quick Draft “Title and Content” test twice, holding the new spec fixed and changing only
user.js. Both runs passed. The old fixture left the saved draft in trash; this fixture removed it. That verifies the cleanup behavior, but not an isolation failure: the new readers use their own author IDs, and Empty Trash still clears posts before each test. I would like to establish that benefit before expanding the shared teardown.No new test is needed solely to justify the cleanup.
AI review ·
gpt-6There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No existing test fails because of them. This PR creates the leak, though. Before, the Quick Draft tests ran as
adminand calleddeleteAllPosts()before each test, which cleared the drafts from the last run. Now each test runs as its own user without that call, and deleting the user moves its saved drafts to the trash. Only the serial Empty Trash spec clears them, so every parallel run would add more. The cleanup replaces thedeleteAllPosts()that this PR removes, so I would keep the two together.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, that explains why the cleanup belongs with the Quick Draft changes. Our local comparison confirms that it removes the saved draft left in trash by user deletion.
One correction: global setup also calls
deleteAllPosts()before each run. The pinned helper includes trash, although it fetches only 100 posts. So accumulation across ordinary runs is not yet established.Could we scope the saved-draft cleanup to Quick Draft, rather than broadening teardown for every user-fixture consumer? That would preserve cleanup of the content this migration creates without relying on an unproven broader isolation benefit. The test-name correction looks good.
AI review ·
gpt-6