WP_Theme_JSON: Prevent implicit coercion in to_ruleset#11236
WP_Theme_JSON: Prevent implicit coercion in to_ruleset#11236ramonjd wants to merge 3 commits intoWordPress:trunkfrom
Conversation
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN: To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| $expected = ':where(body) { margin: 0; }.wp-site-blocks > .alignleft { float: left; margin-right: 2em; }.wp-site-blocks > .alignright { float: right; margin-left: 2em; }.wp-site-blocks > .aligncenter { justify-content: center; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }:where(.wp-site-blocks) > * { margin-block-start: ; margin-block-end: 0; }:where(.wp-site-blocks) > :first-child { margin-block-start: 0; }:where(.wp-site-blocks) > :last-child { margin-block-end: 0; }:root { --wp--style--block-gap: ; }:root :where(.is-layout-flow) > :first-child{margin-block-start: 0;}:root :where(.is-layout-flow) > :last-child{margin-block-end: 0;}:root :where(.is-layout-flow) > *{margin-block-start: 1;margin-block-end: 0;}:root :where(.is-layout-constrained) > :first-child{margin-block-start: 0;}:root :where(.is-layout-constrained) > :last-child{margin-block-end: 0;}:root :where(.is-layout-constrained) > *{margin-block-start: 1;margin-block-end: 0;}:root :where(.is-layout-flex){gap: 1;}:root :where(.is-layout-grid){gap: 1;}.is-layout-flow > .alignleft{float: left;margin-inline-start: 0;margin-inline-end: 2em;}.is-layout-flow > .alignright{float: right;margin-inline-start: 2em;margin-inline-end: 0;}.is-layout-flow > .aligncenter{margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignleft{float: left;margin-inline-start: 0;margin-inline-end: 2em;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignright{float: right;margin-inline-start: 2em;margin-inline-end: 0;}.is-layout-constrained > .aligncenter{margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > :where(:not(.alignleft):not(.alignright):not(.alignfull)){margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}body .is-layout-flex{display: flex;}.is-layout-flex{flex-wrap: wrap;align-items: center;}.is-layout-flex > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}body .is-layout-grid{display: grid;}.is-layout-grid > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}'; | ||
| $expected = ':where(body) { margin: 0; }.wp-site-blocks > .alignleft { float: left; margin-right: 2em; }.wp-site-blocks > .alignright { float: right; margin-left: 2em; }.wp-site-blocks > .aligncenter { justify-content: center; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }:where(.wp-site-blocks) > * { margin-block-start: ; margin-block-end: 0; }:where(.wp-site-blocks) > :first-child { margin-block-start: 0; }:where(.wp-site-blocks) > :last-child { margin-block-end: 0; }:root { --wp--style--block-gap: ; }.is-layout-flow > .alignleft{float: left;margin-inline-start: 0;margin-inline-end: 2em;}.is-layout-flow > .alignright{float: right;margin-inline-start: 2em;margin-inline-end: 0;}.is-layout-flow > .aligncenter{margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignleft{float: left;margin-inline-start: 0;margin-inline-end: 2em;}.is-layout-constrained > .alignright{float: right;margin-inline-start: 2em;margin-inline-end: 0;}.is-layout-constrained > .aligncenter{margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}.is-layout-constrained > :where(:not(.alignleft):not(.alignright):not(.alignfull)){margin-left: auto !important;margin-right: auto !important;}body .is-layout-flex{display: flex;}.is-layout-flex{flex-wrap: wrap;align-items: center;}.is-layout-flex > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}body .is-layout-grid{display: grid;}.is-layout-grid > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test result is different because we're no longer passing settings as metadata. Settings contains no style data, but supports data (mostly bools as values), but the source code was trying to fetch style data nevertheless. Since the paths to the settings and styles are same, the result was bool instead of real gap values.
It was this that led me to remove the silent coercion in to_ruleset.
Test using WordPress PlaygroundThe changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance. WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser. Some things to be aware of
For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation. |
andrewserong
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for backporting, this change looks good to me!
…es and cast numeric values to strings. This change ensures that only plain string values are included in the generated CSS ruleset, improving the handling of declarations.
7cf6326 to
c4acf90
Compare
|
This LGTM but if we're aiming for 7.1 we'll have to wait until the 7.0 release branch is created at RC1 to commit it to trunk. |
|
Also, PHP tests seem to be complaining about your use of setAccessible() |
Argh, < 8.5 wants it, > 8.5 hates it. 🤣
Thanks for the heads up. I'll leave it brewing until then. |
…ersion compatibility.
Brings over changes from:
to_rulesetgutenberg#76392to_rulesetused string concatenation ($element['name'] . ': ' . $element['value'] . ';'), so PHP implicitly coerced non-string values (e.g. booleans →'1'/'', arrays →'Array'). That could emit invalid or misleading CSS.At the same time, pass a
styletheme.json path intest_get_styles_with_appearance_tools()to simulate a style node. Before it wassettings.The fix
Testing
Tests should pass!
Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64848
Use of AI Tools
Diagnostics