Skip to content

feat: introduce flag validate_user_defined_fields#352

Open
Vlad-Bukatin wants to merge 2 commits into
Validus-Risk-Management:mainfrom
Boku-Labs:ignore_user_defined_fields
Open

feat: introduce flag validate_user_defined_fields#352
Vlad-Bukatin wants to merge 2 commits into
Validus-Risk-Management:mainfrom
Boku-Labs:ignore_user_defined_fields

Conversation

@Vlad-Bukatin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Vlad-Bukatin Vlad-Bukatin commented May 14, 2026

closes: #331

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 14, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.31496% with 75 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.29%. Comparing base (b8cb424) to head (0b8f197).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/hotfix-message/src/builder.rs 83.39% 48 Missing ⚠️
crates/hotfix/src/session.rs 16.66% 15 Missing ⚠️
crates/hotfix/src/config.rs 78.94% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #352      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.72%   91.29%   -0.43%     
==========================================
  Files          94       94              
  Lines       10038    10372     +334     
==========================================
+ Hits         9207     9469     +262     
- Misses        831      903      +72     
Flag Coverage Δ
core 91.18% <80.31%> (-0.44%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Vlad-Bukatin Vlad-Bukatin force-pushed the ignore_user_defined_fields branch from 579d0cf to 0b8f197 Compare May 14, 2026 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature Request: Add configuration to allow unknown/custom XML fields

1 participant