Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Permittable

Strong parameters for Rails that also know types, bounds, and defaults.

Gem Version CI Ruby >= 3.2 Rails 5.0 - 8.x License: MIT

Quick start · Guide · Adopting on a live API · Beyond the controller · Reference · Comparison · Changelog


params.permit answers exactly one question: which keys may pass? Everything else — is age really a number, is email shaped like an email, what should plan be when the client omits it, and why was this request rejected — is left to you, usually as hand-written checks scattered through the action.

A Permittable contract answers those questions too. Declared once on the controller class, it casts each field to a declared type, validates it, applies defaults, optionally reshapes the output, and turns every failure into a machine-readable 422 that names the offending parameter.

And because a contract is class-level data rather than code inside the action, it can be inspected — and checked against your database when the controller loads, so a column dropped by a migration fails the deploy instead of the request.

class UsersController < ApplicationController
  include Permittable

  permit_params :create, :update, root: :user, model: User do
    required :name,  :string,  length: 1..80, normalize: :squish
    required :email, :string,  format: URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP, normalize: :email
    optional :age,   :integer, in: 18..120
    optional :ssn,   :string,  sensitive: true          # auto-redacted from logs
    optional :plan,  :string,  in: %w[free pro], default: "free"
    array    :tag_names, of: :string, length: 0..10, virtual: true
    optional :address do
      required :city, :string
      optional :zip,  :string, format: /\A\d{5}\z/
    end
  end

  def create
    User.create!(permitted_params)   # cast, validated, defaulted
  end
end

A violating request never reaches your action:

{ "success": false,
  "error": { "message": "Invalid parameters: user.age (inclusion)",
             "code": "invalid_parameters",
             "details": [{ "param": "user.age", "code": "inclusion" }] } }

Why

Here is what the contract above replaces. Every Rails codebase has a version of this, and no two of them agree on the error shape:

def create
  attrs = params.require(:user).permit(:name, :email, :age, :plan)

  if attrs[:age].present?
    age = Integer(attrs[:age], exception: false)
    return render(json: { error: "age must be a number" }, status: 422) if age.nil?
    return render(json: { error: "age must be 18..120" },  status: 422) unless (18..120).cover?(age)
    attrs[:age] = age
  end
  unless attrs[:email].to_s.match?(URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP)
    return render(json: { error: "email is invalid" }, status: 422)
  end
  attrs[:plan] = "free" if attrs[:plan].blank?

  User.create!(attrs)
end

A contract moves all of it out of the action and into data that the rest of your toolchain can read:

params.permit params.expect (Rails 8) Permittable
Filters unknown keys
Requires a root key via require
Casts to a declared type
Validates bounds, formats, sets
Supplies defaults
Machine-readable error details
Reshapes output
Checked against your schema at boot
Exports OpenAPI / JSON Schema
Report-only rollout mode
Drafts contracts from your schema
Works outside controllers

Every option in this space is good software, and Permittable is not always the right one. A longer, honest comparison — params.expect, rails_param, dry-validation, typed_params, rswag, the cases where each is the better choice, benchmarks, and migration costs — lives in docs/comparison.md.

One idea: a contract is data

Everything in this gem follows from a single decision. A contract is declared once at the class level, frozen, inheritable, and introspectable. It is not code that runs inside your action. That makes it readable by more than the validator:

                  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
                  │  permit_params :create, root: :user, model: User   │
                  │    required :email, :string, format: EMAIL_REGEXP  │
                  │    optional :age,   :integer, in: 18..120          │
                  │  end                                               │
                  └──────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘
                             one frozen, class-level contract
                                             │
         ┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┼─────────────────┬─────────────────┐
         ▼                 ▼                 ▼                 ▼                 ▼
   Validator         Drift guard       OpenAPI           RSpec matchers    Contract
   casts, checks,    compares fields   3.1 export from   assert on the     the same DSL on
   defaults; a 422   to DB columns     the same data     rule itself, no   any Hash, no
   names the         at class load;    the server        request needed    controller
   parameter         fails the deploy  enforces                            required

The principles that fall out of it:

  • Strict, never lenient. "abc" is never 0. A value the type cannot faithfully represent is a violation, not a guess.
  • nil and "" are absent. Absent optionals are omitted from the result, so partial updates never nil-out columns.
  • Mistakes fail at class load. A malformed contract, a default that violates its own field, or a column that no longer exists fails the boot, never the request.
  • The request's params is never mutated. Reshaping happens on the validated copy.
  • Exports never guess. Anything JSON Schema cannot represent stays visible as an x-permittable-* extension instead of being mistranslated.
  • One dependency. activesupport is the only runtime requirement. Rails, ActionPack, and ActiveRecord are optional integration points.

Quick start

1. Add the gem

gem "permittable"

2. Include it once

class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
  include Permittable
end

3. Declare a contract and read permitted_params

class OrdersController < ApplicationController
  permit_params :create, root: :order, model: Order do
    required :sku,      :string
    optional :quantity, :integer, in: 1..99, default: 1
    optional :notes,    :string,  length: 0..500
  end

  def create
    Order.create!(permitted_params)
  end
end

That is the whole integration. Violations render the 422 envelope automatically, model: Order verifies the fields against the orders table when the class loads, and every rejected request emits an invalid_parameters.permittable notification.

Adopting on an existing API with live traffic? Skip ahead to Adopting on a live API: the gem can draft the contracts for you, and run them in a report-only mode until you are ready to enforce.

Naming note: some legacy stacks (InheritedResources) define their own permitted_params. Don't include both on one controller.

Contents


Guide

How a request flows

request params
   │
   ├─ 1  unwrap root:        params[:user]                missing or not a hash → 400
   ├─ 2  each field          normalize → absent? → cast → validate → transform
   ├─ 3  unknown-key check   at every nesting level       (unknown: :ignore | :log | :error)
   ├─ 4  finalize            only when nothing violated
   │
   └─ permitted_params  →  HashWithIndifferentAccess      or raises InvalidParameters → 422

Validation is lazy by default: it runs on the first permitted_params call, so an action that never reads params never pays for it. Pass enforce: true to run it in a before_action instead, rejecting bad requests before the action body executes. Results are memoized per action.

In monitor mode the same flow runs, but a violation is reported instead of raised and the request proceeds with the raw params passed through.

Declaring a contract

permit_params(*actions, root: false, model: nil, unknown: :ignore, enforce: false, mode: nil, desc: nil, &contract)
Option Default Meaning
*actions Actions the contract covers. No actions = catch-all for the controller
root: false Key to unwrap first (the require(:user) equivalent). Missing or non-hash root → 400
model: nil Model class, or true to infer from controller_name, enabling the drift guard
unknown: :ignore :ignore / :log / :error — how to treat undeclared keys
enforce: false false validates lazily on first use; true validates in a before_action
mode: nil nil follows Permittable.mode; :monitor reports violations instead of rejecting — see monitor mode
desc: nil Documentation only — becomes the operation description in exported OpenAPI

permit_params is repeatable, and the last matching rule wins. Contracts behave like configuration: a base controller declares a catch-all, and a subclass overrides it for specific actions.

class ApiController < ApplicationController
  permit_params(unknown: :error) { optional :page, :integer, in: 1..1000 }   # catch-all
end

class ReportsController < ApiController
  permit_params :export, root: :report do                                    # wins for #export
    required :format, :string, in: %w[csv pdf]
  end
end

Rules accumulate by reassignment, never mutation, so subclasses inherit copy-on-write and can never corrupt a parent's contract.

The field DSL

Three verbs. required and optional declare scalars (or, with a block, nested hashes); array declares a list.

# Scalars — the type defaults to :string
required :name, :string
optional :age,  :integer

# Nested hashes — pass a block instead of a type. Violation paths are dotted: user.address.zip
optional :address do
  required :city, :string
  optional :zip,  :string, format: /\A\d{5}\z/
end

# Arrays — of: for scalars, a block for hashes. Element failures carry their index: items[1].sku
array :tag_names,  of: :string, length: 0..10
array :line_items, required: true, length: 1..50 do
  required :sku,      :string
  required :quantity, :integer, in: 1..99
end

# Free-form hashes — :json takes any hash, uncast and unfiltered, with bounds
optional :metadata, :json, max_depth: 3, length: 0..32

Arrays are optional unless required: true, and length: on an array constrains the element count.

length: is a bound, not a report: an array outside it is rejected without its elements being examined at all. A 200,000-element payload against length: 0..10 is refused by its first check, so it costs one violation and a 40-byte body instead of 200,001 violations and several megabytes — milliseconds of contract work instead of seconds. There is no default cap: an array with no length: is unbounded, and every element of it is cast and checked however many arrive. Declare length: on every array you accept.

Field options

Which options are legal depends on the field kind — anything else raises at class load.

Option Scalar Array Nested Meaning
in: Allowed values: a Range (bounds-checked with cover?) or an Array
format: ✅¹ Regexp the value must match, or a preset name: :email, :uuid, :url, :slug, :hostname
length: ✅¹ Range or Integer. Character count on strings, element count on arrays, where it short-circuits — see the field DSL
normalize: ✅¹ :squish, :strip, :downcase, :upcase, :email, or a Proc. Runs first — before the absence rule, so a value that normalizes to "" is absent
default: Value used when the field is absent. Validated against the field's own contract at class load, then stored normalized and frozen (each request gets its own copy)
validate: Callable. Falsy fails as "invalid"; a returned Symbol becomes the violation code
transform: Callable applied after cast and validation — see output reshaping
virtual: Exempt this field from the schema-drift guard
sensitive: Register the field name for log redaction
message: Human-readable copy for violations on this field — a String, or a Hash of code → String. See custom messages
of: Element type for an array of scalars (default :string)
max_depth: :json fields only — maximum container nesting. See free-form hashes
required: Arrays are optional unless this is true
desc: Documentation only — the field's description in exported OpenAPI
example: Documentation only, but validated against the field's own contract at class load, like default:
nullable: An explicitly-sent empty value yields nil instead of counting as absent — see explicit nulls

¹ format:, length:, and normalize: reason about characters and are only valid on :string fields. On any other type they would silently apply to an already-cast value, so declaring them raises at class load.

Checks run in a fixed order, and the first failure is the one reported:

normalize:  →  cast  →  length:  →  in:  →  format:  →  validate:

length: comes before in: and format: on purpose. It is an O(1) read of a string's size, while format: runs a regexp over the whole value and validate: runs your own code — so a value the length bound already excludes never pays for the expensive checks. A 5 MB string against length: 1..80 is rejected on its length without the regexp ever seeing it, which matters most when the regexp is one with poor worst-case behaviour.

The visible consequence: a value that violates both its length and its format reports length. That is the more useful answer anyway — a client can't act on "wrong format" for a value that is also far too long.

validate: is the escape hatch for anything the built-ins don't cover:

optional :slug, :string, validate: ->(v) { v.match?(/\A[a-z0-9-]+\z/) || :malformed_slug }

format: presets

The regexps every app writes by hand, named once:

required :email,   :string, format: :email
required :id,      :string, format: :uuid
optional :website, :string, format: :url
optional :slug,    :string, format: :slug
optional :host,    :string, format: :hostname
Preset Matches Exported JSON Schema format
:email Exactly URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP — the regexp Rails apps already paste in, so switching to the preset cannot change which addresses an endpoint accepts email
:uuid A canonical 8-4-4-4-12 UUID, either case uuid
:url An http/https URL. A shape check, not a reachability guarantee — but it does reject javascript: and other schemes uri
:slug Lowercase, digits, single hyphens between segments
:hostname A DNS hostname (label rules, no trailing dot) hostname

A preset carries something a hand-written Regexp cannot: the JSON Schema format keyword the wider ecosystem understands, so exported docs say "format": "uuid" rather than only a wall of pattern. The pattern is still emitted next to it — in draft 2020-12 format is an annotation unless a validator opts into asserting it, so the pattern is what actually enforces.

An unknown preset name fails at class load, listing the presets. Passing a Regexp directly works exactly as before, and the RSpec matcher speaks both spellings: matching(:email) asserts the preset, matching(/re/) the Regexp.

Types and strict coercion

Coercion is deliberately strict, and deliberately not ActiveModel::Type. Rails' casts are lenient by design — "abc".to_i is 0, Boolean.cast("abc") is true — and silently corrupting untrusted input is precisely what a contract must not do. A value the type cannot faithfully represent is a violation, not a guess.

Type Accepts Rejects (invalid_type)
:string String; Numeric/true/false are stringified Arrays, hashes
:integer Integer; whole Floats (4.0); base-10 numeric strings "4.5", "abc", 4.5
:float Numeric; any Float()-parseable string "abc"
:decimal Numeric or StringBigDecimal Unparseable strings
:boolean true/false, "true"/"false", "1"/"0", 1/0 "yes", "on", 2
:date Date; a string naming a complete date, in any format Date.parse understands ("2026-09-05", "2026/09/05", "Sep 5, 2026") Unparseable strings, and incomplete ones ("09/2026", "5th", "Sept")
:datetime Time, DateTime, ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone, Date; a string naming a complete date, with or without a time Unparseable strings, and any string without a complete date ("10:30")
:json Any Hash — passed through uncast, see free-form hashes Arrays, scalars

Dates are parsed, never guessed. Date.parse fills in what a string omits from today"09/2026" becomes the 1st, "5th" becomes this month of this year — so the same request would mean different things on different days. A :date or :datetime string must therefore name all three of year, month and day; which format it names them in is Date.parse's business, so every complete format it understands still works. A :datetime may omit the time part, which reads as midnight UTC.

Numbers must be finite. Float("1e400") is Infinity and Float("1e-400") is 0.0 — neither represents what was sent, and neither is a value a numeric column can store, so both are invalid_type. A genuine zero is unaffected however it is spelled ("0", "0.0", "0e10"). :decimal has no exponent limit, so "1e400" is fine there — but BigDecimal("NaN") and BigDecimal("Infinity") succeed where Float() raises, so those literal strings are rejected explicitly.

Two more behaviours worth committing to memory:

  • Type confusion is a violation, not a 500. A request of ?age[]=1 against a scalar :integer field yields invalid_type. Arrays, hashes, and nested ActionController::Parameters can never satisfy a scalar type, so the classic "NoMethodError on []" crash is impossible.
  • Datetimes are normalised to UTC. A zoneless string parses as UTC regardless of the host timezone, which keeps behaviour deterministic across machines; explicit offsets are honoured and converted.

Free-form hashes (:json)

A json/jsonb column exists precisely so its contents need no schema. Every other field kind describes a shape, so until :json a contract had only bad options for one: declare sub-keys you don't know, or leave the key undeclared — in which case the contract silently dropped it, and the column never saw the data. Strong parameters has always had an answer here (params.permit(metadata: {})); now so does a contract.

permit_params :create, root: :user, model: User do
  required :name,     :string
  optional :metadata, :json, max_depth: 3, length: 0..32
end

The hash passes through untouched — keys are neither filtered nor cast, nested arrays and mixed scalars survive, and unknown: does not descend into it. {} is a value, not an absence. Anything that is not a hash (an array, a string, a number) is invalid_type.

What you give up is the shape. What you keep:

length: Caps the top-level key count — same reading as an array's element count
max_depth: Caps container nesting, counting arrays as a level: {"a": 1} is 1, {"a": {"b": 1}} and {"a": [1, 2]} are 2, {"a": [{"b": 1}]} is 3. Violation code depth
validate: / transform: See the whole hash, so any check you can write in Ruby still applies
model: The field maps onto a column like a scalar does, so the drift guard still catches a dropped metadata column
sensitive: / nullable: / message: / desc: / default: / example: Behave as on any other field (default:/example: must be a hash, and are checked against the field's own bounds at class load)

Bounding it matters more than it looks: an unbounded jsonb column is where clients put megabytes and 200-level-deep objects. max_depth: and length: are how a contract says "opaque, but not unlimited" — which is strictly more than permit(metadata: {}) can say.

Values arrive as plain data (HashWithIndifferentAccess), never ActionController::Parameters, so assigning straight to a jsonb attribute is safe.

In exported OpenAPI the field is {"type": "object"} plus minProperties/maxProperties; JSON Schema has no nesting-depth keyword, so max_depth: stays visible as x-permittable-max-depth rather than being dropped or mistranslated.

Absence, defaults, and partial updates

nil and "" are both treated as absent — the query-parameter convention, where an untouched form field arrives as an empty string. Boolean false is present. normalize: runs before this rule, so a field declared normalize: :squish treats " " as absent too: whitespace cannot satisfy a required field by becoming "".

That single rule produces the behaviour you want from a PATCH:

The field is… Result
absent and optional omitted from the result, so partial updates never nil-out columns
absent and required a missing violation
absent with a default: the default — a defaulted field can never report missing

Declaring required: alongside default: is a class-load error, since a default implies optionality. And because absence and nil are the same thing here, a plain field cannot clear a column to NULL — declare it nullable: when it should.

Defaults are checked against the field's own contract when the class loads, so default: "gold" on a field declared in: %w[free pro] fails at boot rather than on every request.

Explicit nulls (nullable:)

One rule — nil and "" are absent — is right for PATCH and wrong for the request that means clear this. nullable: true splits it in two for a single field:

permit_params :update, root: :user, model: User do
  optional :nickname, :string, nullable: true
  optional :plan,     :string, in: %w[free pro], default: "free", nullable: true
end
Request nickname in the result
{ "user": {} } omitted — the column is untouched
{ "user": { "nickname": null } } nil — the column is cleared
{ "user": { "nickname": "" } } nil — the form-encoded spelling of the same intent

A key the client never sent is still absent: default: applies to it and a required field still violates with missing. Only present-but-empty changes meaning, and it changes it decisively — an explicit null wins over the field's default:, which is the behaviour a PATCH needs ({ "plan": null } clears the plan instead of silently resetting it to "free").

Nothing is cast or checked for an explicit null. in:, format:, length:, validate:, and transform: all see a value or nothing at all — never a nil they never agreed to handle.

Three more readings worth knowing:

  • required + nullable is coherent, and means what it says in SQL: the client must state the field, and null is a legal statement. A missing key still violates.
  • default: nil — legal only on a nullable field — gives the PUT reading, where absence also means clear.
  • On arrays and nested blocks, nullable: applies to the array or object itself, never to its contents. { "tags": null } yields nil (distinct from [], which still gets length-checked); a null element inside tags is still invalid_type.

Exported OpenAPI tells the truth about all of this: a nullable field's type gains "null", and a nullable in: set lists null in its enum.

Violations and error responses

Every failure raises Permittable::InvalidParameters, carrying details (an array of { param:, code: }, plus a message: when the field declares one) and a status. On a real controller it is auto-rescued into the error envelope shown at the top of this README.

Code Raised when
missing A required field is absent, or the root: key is absent (that one is a 400)
invalid_type The value cannot be faithfully cast to the declared type — including a root: key the client did send with the wrong shape ({"user": "bob"}), which is also a 400
inclusion The value is outside in:
format The value doesn't match format:
length A string's length, or an array's element count, is outside length:
unknown An undeclared key was sent while unknown: :error
invalid A validate: callable returned a falsy value
your symbol A validate: callable returned a Symbol, or violate! was called in finalize

Paths are fully qualified: user.address.zip, line_items[1].sku.

details is complete; message is prose. The details array names every offender, however many there are — it is the machine-readable channel and nothing is dropped from it. The message string is a sentence for a person, and it also lands in your logs and in every exception tracker, so it is bounded: at most ten offenders, each truncated past 120 characters, then a count of the rest (…, and 49990 more). Before that bound, a request carrying 50,000 undeclared keys against unknown: :error produced a 1 MB exception message and a 1 MB log line. The 422 body still carries the complete details, so it stays proportional to the number of violations; the field bounds are what keep that number down.

Status codes. A bad root key renders 400 — the request is malformed; the envelope you asked for isn't there, or isn't an object. Field-level violations render 422 — well-formed, semantically wrong. The two root failures are told apart by their code: missing when the key really is absent ({}, {"user": null}, {"user": ""}), invalid_type when the client sent it with the wrong shape.

Custom rendering. If your controller defines render_error, the envelope delegates to it as render_error(message:, code:, status:, errors:) — the errors: key is passed only when details exist, so hosts documenting a three-keyword contract keep working. Otherwise the inline JSON shape is rendered. Either way, render_invalid_parameters is a normal method you can override, and Permittable.error_format = :problem swaps the whole shape for RFC 9457 problem details. For full control beyond that, error.details gives you the structured violations to build from.

Custom error messages (message:)

Violations stay machine-first — the code is the contract — but any field can attach human-readable copy with message:. A String covers every code on the field; a Hash of code → String targets specific codes, and codes without an entry keep the default rendering:

permit_params :create, root: :user do
  required :email, :string, format: URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP,
                            message: { missing: "is required", format: "must be a valid email address" }
  optional :age,   :integer, in: 18..120, message: "must be between 18 and 120"
  array    :tags,  of: :string, length: 0..10, message: "must be at most ten tags"
end

A resolved message rides into the violation detail and replaces the (code) part of the exception's summary line, so both the envelope's message and its details read naturally:

{ "success": false,
  "error": { "message": "Invalid parameters: user.email must be a valid email address",
             "code": "invalid_parameters",
             "details": [{ "param": "user.email", "code": "format",
                           "message": "must be a valid email address" }] } }

The rules:

  • Messages are written to read after the param name: "is required", not "Email is required".
  • A Hash key matches the violation code, including Symbol codes returned by validate:validate: ->(v) { v.even? || :must_be_even }, message: { must_be_even: "must be an even number" }.
  • An array's message covers the array's own violations (length, invalid_type, missing) and its elements' (tags[3]); sub-fields of a nested block resolve their own message: declarations.
  • violate! in finalize takes the same idea as a keyword: violate!("user.ends_at", :before_start, message: "must be after starts_at").
  • A message: that is neither a String nor a code → String Hash raises at class load, like every other contract mistake.

Localizing default messages (I18n)

App-wide copy for a violation code — without repeating message: on every field — comes from I18n, under permittable.errors.<code>:

# config/locales/en.yml
en:
  permittable:
    errors:
      missing: "is required"
      invalid_type: "is the wrong type"
      inclusion: "is not an allowed value"
      unknown: "is not a recognized parameter"

Resolution order per violation: the field's own message: (String, or the Hash entry for that code) → the app's permittable.errors.<code> translation → the bare { param:, code: } shape. The lookup also covers a missing root:, unknown keys, Symbol codes returned by validate: (permittable.errors.must_be_even), and violate! codes in finalize (an explicit violate!(..., message:) still wins). Only a String translation counts — a missing key or a nested Hash falls back to the bare shape rather than leaking structure to clients. No I18n, no change: apps without the gem or the keys behave exactly as before.

RFC 9457 problem+json

For a public API, the standard shape for an error is RFC 9457 Problem Details. One app-wide setting renders it:

# config/initializers/permittable.rb
Permittable.error_format = :problem
Permittable.problem_base_uri = "https://api.example.com/problems"   # optional
HTTP/1.1 422 Unprocessable Entity
Content-Type: application/problem+json
{
  "type": "https://api.example.com/problems/invalid-parameters",
  "title": "Invalid parameters",
  "status": 422,
  "detail": "Invalid parameters: user.email (format), user.age (inclusion)",
  "instance": "/users",
  "errors": [
    { "param": "user.email", "code": "format" },
    { "param": "user.age",   "code": "inclusion" }
  ]
}
  • errors is the field-violation extension member, carrying the identical { param:, code: } entries (plus message: when the field declares one) that the default envelope puts in details. Nothing about violation reporting changes — only the wrapper.
  • title describes the problem type, not the instance: a missing root: is "Malformed request" (400), a field violation is "Invalid parameters" (422).
  • type is RFC 9457's default "about:blank" until you set problem_base_uri, at which point each problem type gets its own URI under it.
  • instance is the request path, and is omitted rather than guessed when the host can't name one (a params duck, a job).
  • Setting :problem opts out of render_error delegation. A host envelope and a problem document are two answers to the same question, and the explicit setting is the one honoured.

The setting is app-wide, not per-contract, because the error format of an API is a property of the API. Exported OpenAPI follows it: with :problem configured, the shared response components describe the problem schema under application/problem+json instead of the envelope under application/json — an export runs inside the app that made the setting, so the documented shape can't drift from the rendered one.

Unknown parameters

unknown: decides what happens to keys you never declared, at every nesting level.

Mode Behaviour
:ignore (default) Silently dropped, exactly like strong parameters
:log Dropped, with a logger.warn naming the full paths — at most ten of them, then a count, so one request cannot write a megabyte of log
:error Each undeclared key becomes an unknown violation

Under :log that bound is the whole record: nothing else names an undeclared key, so beyond the tenth only the count survives. Where you need every name — auditing what a client really sends during a rollout — use unknown: :error in monitor mode, which records all of them in details and in the instrumentation payload without rejecting the request.

Rails merges its own keys into params: controller, action, and format from the router, plus authenticity_token, _method, utf8, and commit from an ordinary form POST. All seven are exempt at the top level, so unknown: :error flags what the client got wrong rather than what the framework added. Inside a root: or a nested hash there is no such exemption, because nothing legitimately injects keys there — and a standalone Contract exempts nothing at all, having neither a router nor a form.

The exemption covers the check only. Monitor mode still hands back the form keys in its raw pass-through, where behaving exactly like the pre-contract app is the whole promise and a legacy action may read _method itself; only the router's three are dropped there.

Output reshaping (transform: and finalize)

This is the safe replacement for params-mutating before_actions. Both layers operate on the validated copy — the request's params is never touched.

transform: — per field. A callable applied after cast and validation, reshaping one field's output:

required :tags, :string, transform: ->(v) { v.split(",") }

It runs only on request-supplied values. Absent fields stay absent, default: values are authored in their final shape, and a partially-invalid array is never transformed — user code is never handed garbage it didn't agree to see.

finalize — per contract. Declared once, at the top level only. It runs after every field has validated cleanly, receives the result hash, and must return the final Hash. Use it to combine parallel fields, build value objects, or drop scaffolding keys.

It executes on a bare runner, not the controller, so contracts stay pure data plus pure functions and can never grow a dependency on request state. Its one extra verb is violate!(param, code, message: nil), which records a violation and halts the block immediately — so the code after a violate! may assume the invariant it just checked. That makes finalize the natural home for cross-field validation (ends_at after starts_at, matching array lengths).

permit_params :create, root: :lease_addendum_form do
  required :resident_signatures, :string, transform: ->(v) { v.split("<<delimiter>>") }
  required :signer_names,        :string, transform: ->(v) { v.split(",") }

  finalize do |p|
    unless p[:signer_names].length == p[:resident_signatures].length
      violate!("lease_addendum_form.signer_names", :length_mismatch)
    end

    p[:signatures] = p[:resident_signatures].zip(p[:signer_names]).map do |image, name|
      Signature.new(image: image, full_name: name)
    end
    p.except(:resident_signatures, :signer_names)
  end
end

Forgetting to return the hash raises an ArgumentError telling you exactly that.

The schema-drift guard

This is why model: exists. Pass a model class (or true to infer it from controller_name) and every non-virtual scalar field is checked against the model's columns when the macro runs — that is, at controller class load.

Production eager-loads controllers, so a column dropped by a migration fails the deploy, not the request:

Permittable: 'nickname' does not exist in the database (table: users).
Add it with: bin/rails generate migration AddNicknameToUsers nickname:string
If this parameter is not backed by a column, declare it with virtual: true.

The error carries a ready-to-paste migration command, typed from your own field declaration.

Checking types too (opt-in)

A dropped column fails the deploy; a retyped one doesn't, unless you ask:

# config/initializers/permittable.rb
Permittable.check_column_types = true
Permittable: 'placed_at' is declared :string but the column is :datetime (table: orders).
Change the contract to match the column, migrate the column to match the contract,
or declare the field virtual: true if it is not backed by this column.

It is off by default on purpose. Every cross-type declaration has some legitimate use — a :string contract on a date column that lets ActiveRecord do the casting, a :boolean contract on a legacy integer column — and breaking those apps on an upgrade would cost more than the drift it catches. Turn it on and fix what it finds.

When enabled it compares groups, not exact types, so it fires on a genuine cross-family mismatch and stays quiet otherwise:

Group Column types
text string, text, citext, uuid, enum, char
numeric integer, bigint, float, decimal, boolean
temporal date, datetime, time, timestamp, timestamptz

boolean sits with the numerics because a boolean stored as an integer 0/1 is a real legacy pattern and ActiveRecord casts cleanly between them; the temporal types are one group because a :date contract on a datetime column is a narrowing, not drift.

Any column type not in that table — json, jsonb, binary, an adapter's own inet or money — is never checked. A contract has no faithful type for those, so whatever you improvised is left alone rather than guessed about.

  • Fields not backed by a columnpassword_confirmation, terms checkboxes, search filters — opt out with virtual: true.
  • Nested and array fields are implicitly virtual, since only scalars map one-to-one onto columns.
  • The check skips when the schema is unreachable (db:create, a fresh db:migrate, assets:precompile, CI bootstrap), so controller classes stay loadable. Skipping is self-healing: once the migration runs and classes reload, the check happens for real. A missing column with a reachable schema still raises — the rescue is scoped to ActiveRecord::ActiveRecordError precisely so real bugs keep surfacing.

In CI, one spec calling Rails.application.eager_load! exercises every contract in the whole app.

Sensitive parameters and log redaction

Mark a field sensitive: true and its name is registered with Permittable.filter_parameter_registry; Permittable::Railtie appends a filter proc to config.filter_parameters at boot.

optional :ssn, :string, sensitive: true

On a nested block or an array, sensitive: cascades to everything inside it:

optional :payment, sensitive: true do
  required :card_number, :string        # redacted
  optional :cvv,         :string        # redacted
  optional :id,          :string, sensitive: false   # NOT redacted — see below
end

It has to. Rails' parameter filtering walks into hashes and arrays itself and asks a proc filter about the leaf values only, handing it the leaf's own key and never the path that led there. So registering payment alone redacts nothing inside it: the filter descends and asks about card_number, which the container's name does not match.

A sub-field opts out with an explicit sensitive: false. That exists because matching is a case-insensitive substring match, so cascading a generic name like :id or :name would redact every parameter in the app that happens to contain it — occasionally a worse outcome than the leak it prevents. Only false opts out; sensitive: nil reads as "not stated" and still inherits.

The cascade is resolved onto the field when the contract loads, so everything that reads a contract agrees: the value is redacted from logs, the exported schema marks the child writeOnly, and permit_param("payment.card_number").sensitive passes.

Two mechanisms, because neither covers the ground alone.

A single proc appended once at boot, consulting a live registry at filter time, is what reaches consumers that snapshot config.filter_parameters at boot — ActiveRecord's filter_attributes copy, lograge-style initializers — so a field registered when a controller loads later (lazy loading in development) is still redacted there. The initializer runs before active_record.set_filter_attributes, so values are redacted from both request logs and #inspect.

But a proc filter can only redact String values: ActiveSupport dups the value and expects in-place mutation, and for a Hash value it never calls the proc at all, recursing into it instead. So each name is also registered as a name in config.filter_parameters, which redacts a value of any type — an :integer field, or a whole sensitive nested block. Appending later still works: Rails' precompile_filter_parameters replaces that array in place, and ActionDispatch reads the same object on every request, so a name registered at class-load time is seen by the next request. (This is also why the mechanism is a name and not a live matcher object: precompilation joins patterns by source, which discards anything whose matching is decided at filter time.)

Matching mirrors Rails' own symbol-filter semantics: case-insensitive substring match on the parameter key. The registry is fully duck-typed (#add, #include?, #to_proc, #names, #reset!) and swappable via Permittable.filter_parameter_registry=, so a host gem can pool registrations into its own. #to_proc must return a callable of arity 2 (key, value) or 3 (key, value, original_params), matching what Rails' own parameter filtering accepts; anything that does not respond to #to_proc is refused at the point of the swap rather than on the next request.

The swap works at any point, including from config/initializers — which matters, because Rails runs railtie initializers before those, so a swap always happens after Permittable::Railtie has appended its filter. Two things make that safe. The appended proc (Permittable.filter_parameter_proc) resolves the registry at filter time rather than closing over whichever instance existed at boot, so whichever registry is current does the redacting. And the swap carries the previous registry's names into the new one, so a sensitive: field registered by a contract that loaded before the swap keeps being redacted afterwards. Without that, the two halves of an app would each redact only what the other did not.

Instrumentation

Every violation emits an ActiveSupport::Notifications event, so rejected requests can be dashboarded and alerted on — exactly once per action per request, however many times the action reads the params (permitted_params memoizes the outcome, rejections included):

ActiveSupport::Notifications.subscribe("invalid_parameters.permittable") do |*, payload|
  payload[:controller]  # "users"
  payload[:action]      # "create"
  payload[:mode]        # :enforce, or :monitor for a would-be rejection
  payload[:details]     # [{ param: "user.age", code: "inclusion" }]
end

Adopting on a live API

Adding contracts to an API with real traffic has a chicken-and-egg problem: you cannot know what the 422s would break until you enforce them, and you dare not enforce them until you know. Old mobile app versions, third-party integrations, and forgotten cron jobs all send what they send.

Permittable's answer is an afternoon-sized recipe:

  1. Draft. bin/rails permittable:generate writes a first contract for every controller from the model's columns and the params.permit calls already in the source. Action code stays as-is.
  2. Monitor. Deploy with PERMITTABLE_MODE=monitor. Behaviour is unchanged; every would-be rejection is logged and instrumented.
  3. Watch. Point your existing notification subscriber at a dashboard. Every entry is a real client that would have been rejected — fix the contract, or wait for that traffic to drain.
  4. Enforce. Flip to enforce, controller by controller. Every 422 you now return is one you already counted.

The two halves of that recipe are below.

Monitor mode (roll out without rejecting)

mode: :monitor runs the full pipeline — unwrap, cast, validate, defaults — but a violation is reported instead of rejected and the request proceeds exactly as it did before the contract existed.

class OrdersController < ApplicationController
  permit_params :create, root: :order, mode: :monitor do
    required :sku,      :string
    optional :quantity, :integer, in: 1..99
  end

  # The action doesn't have to change while monitoring — it can keep reading
  # params the old way; the contract validates in the before_action.
end

Or flip the whole app at once and pin controllers to their final mode one at a time — a rule's own mode: always beats the global, in both directions:

# config/initializers/permittable.rb
Permittable.mode = ENV.fetch("PERMITTABLE_MODE", "enforce").to_sym

On a violating request in monitor mode:

  • Nothing raises and nothing renders — the action runs.
  • The invalid_parameters.permittable event fires with mode: :monitor in the payload (enforced violations carry mode: :enforce), and the logger warns with the offending paths.
  • permitted_params returns the raw pass-through: exactly what the client sent, untouched — no casts, no defaults, no transforms. A missing root: passes an empty hash; a rootless contract drops only Rails' routing keys.
  • permittable_violations returns the recorded details ([] when the request was clean), if the action wants to branch on or tag the traffic.

Monitor-mode rules validate eagerly in the before_action, regardless of enforce: — telemetry must not depend on the action calling permitted_params, since legacy actions still reading params directly are exactly the ones worth monitoring. (On a plain-Ruby host without before_action, validation stays lazy.)

Exported OpenAPI marks operations whose rule declares mode: :monitor with x-permittable-mode: "monitor" — the docs shouldn't promise a 422 the server doesn't yet send. Only the per-rule declaration is exported: the global Permittable.mode is runtime configuration, not contract data.

Generating draft contracts (permittable:generate)

The blank-page problem, solved: the first draft of every contract is generated from what the app already knows — the model's columns, and the params calls already sitting in the controller, in either spelling (params.require(...).permit(...) or Rails 8's params.expect(...)).

bin/rails permittable:generate                      # every controller without a contract
bin/rails "permittable:generate[UsersController]"   # one controller, even if covered

For each controller the task infers the model from controller_name (columns give types, NOT NULL gives required), scans the controller source for params.require(...).permit(...) and params.expect(...) calls (permitted keys give the field list and the root:), and prints a paste-ready draft:

# Drafted by permittable:generate — review the TODOs, then deploy: monitor
# mode reports violations (instrumentation + log) without rejecting requests.
permit_params :create, :update, root: :user, model: User, mode: :monitor do
  required :name, :string
  optional :age, :integer
  optional :status, :string # database default: "active"
  optional :password_confirmation, :string, virtual: true # TODO: not a database column — confirm the type
  array :tag_names, of: :string # TODO: confirm the element type, and declare length: — an array without one is unbounded
end

The generator's one rule is draft, don't guess — everything it cannot know for sure stays visible instead of silently decided:

  • Drafts come out in monitor mode, so pasting one changes nothing until you flip it.
  • A permitted key that isn't a column becomes virtual: true with a TODO; a column type with no faithful representation (binary, geometry types) becomes a TODO comment; a permit argument the conservative parser can't read (*dynamic_keys) is kept verbatim in a TODO instead of dropped.
  • Comments are not code. A commented-out params.require(:admin).permit(:superuser) kept for reference is skipped, so it can't contribute a root or a field to the draft. The source is tokenised with Ripper for this, because # is only sometimes a comment — a permit call inside #{'#{...}'} interpolation is live code and is still read, and quoted keys like permit("name") still work.
  • A database default is noted in a comment but not copied into default: — a contract default is injected on every request that omits the field, which would overwrite columns on partial updates. The database already handles creation.
  • key: [:a, :b] in a permit call drafts as a nested block, with a TODO noting it may be an array of hashes. In a params.expect call the two shapes are distinguishable — key: [:a] is a nested hash, key: [[:a]] is an array of hashes — so that draft carries no TODO at all.
  • In a params.expect call, a route param sitting next to the envelope (params.expect(:id, user: [:name])) is not drafted as a field; it stays visible in a TODO, because a routing key is not body input. Neither is a second envelope, which belongs under a different root: than one contract can express.

No Rails required for the core: Permittable::Generator.draft(model: User), .for_controller(controller, source: File.read(path)), and .scan(source) are plain Ruby.


Auditing coverage (permittable:audit)

A controller declaring permit_params :create looks adopted. If it also answers PATCH, that action is validating nothing — and until now nothing in the gem said so. permittable:generate only notices controllers with no contract at all, and the OpenAPI export documents what exists rather than what is missing.

The audit crosses the contract registry with the route set, so a half-covered controller is as visible as an uncovered one:

bin/rails permittable:audit             # the table plus a summary
bin/rails "permittable:audit[strict]"   # ...and exit 1 on any unguarded write action
legacy/invoices
  POST   /legacy/invoices                   create       no contract — ACCEPTS A BODY
orders
  POST   /orders                            create       enforce
  PUT    /orders/{id}                       update       no contract — ACCEPTS A BODY
users
  GET    /users                             index        no contract
  POST   /users                             create       enforce  model: User  unknown: error
  DELETE /users/{id}                        destroy      monitor
  PATCH  /users/{id}                        update       enforce  model: User  unknown: error

7 routed actions: 3 enforced, 1 in monitor mode, 3 without a contract
  2 of those accept a request body — untrusted input reaches the action unchecked
  2 covered actions declare no model:, so no schema-drift guard runs for them

Contracts declared for actions no route reaches (renamed or deleted?):
  users#archive

Three things it tells you that nothing else does:

  • Which write actions are unguarded. A GET without a contract is usually fine; a POST without one is untrusted input reaching the action unchecked. That count is the number [strict] fails on, which makes the task a CI gate: no new unguarded write endpoint.
  • Which contracts aren't enforcing yet. The audit runs inside the app, so unlike the exported OpenAPI it resolves the effective mode — a rule's own mode: first, then your app-wide Permittable.mode. This is the monitor-mode rollout dashboard.
  • Which contracts have gone stale. A contract declared for an action no route reaches is a renamed or deleted action that left its contract behind.

Controllers that never included Permittable are audited too — those are the ones worth finding. Everything is plain Ruby over the frozen registry plus route descriptors, so Permittable::Audit.entries(controllers:, routes:) works without Rails.


Beyond the controller

Because a contract is data, it has readers other than the request validator.

Testing contracts (RSpec matchers)

A contract can be specified without dispatching a request. require "permittable/rspec" (in spec_helper.rb) auto-includes the matchers:

RSpec.describe UsersController do
  it "declares the create contract" do
    expect(described_class).to permit_param(:email)
      .for_action(:create).as(:string).matching(URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP).required
    expect(described_class).to permit_param(:age).for_action(:create).as(:integer).within(18..120)
    expect(described_class).to permit_param(:plan).for_action(:create).with_default("free")
    expect(described_class).to permit_param(:tag_names).for_action(:create).as_array(of: :string)
    expect(described_class).to permit_param("address.zip").for_action(:create).as(:string).optional
    expect(described_class).not_to permit_param(:admin).for_action(:create)
  end
end

Chains: for_action, as, as_array(of:), required / optional, within (in:), matching (format:), with_length, with_default, virtual, sensitive. Dotted paths walk nested blocks and array-of-hash blocks alike ("line_items.sku").

for_action picks the rule exactly like a request would (permit_rule_for), and may be omitted only when the controller declares a single contract — an ambiguous expectation raises instead of silently checking the wrong rule. Failure messages name what the contract actually declares.

Standalone contracts (no controller)

The same DSL, callable on any Hash — webhook payloads, job arguments, service-object inputs, CSV rows:

CreateUser = Permittable::Contract.define(root: :user) do
  required :email, :string, format: URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP
  optional :age,   :integer, in: 18..120
  optional :plan,  :string, in: %w[free pro], default: "free"
end

result = CreateUser.call(payload)     # never raises
result.valid?                          # => false
result.violations                      # => [{ param: "user.age", code: "inclusion" }]
result.params                          # validated HashWithIndifferentAccess; nil when invalid

CreateUser.call!(payload)              # params, or raises Permittable::InvalidParameters
CreateUser.json_schema                 # the contract as JSON Schema (draft 2020-12)
CreateUser.rule                        # the frozen, introspectable rule data

Everything carries over — strict coercion, ""/nil absence, defaults, finalize with violate!, sensitive: log-redaction registration, invalid_parameters.permittable instrumentation, 400-vs-422 status semantics for a missing root:. Three differences, all deliberate:

  • A Contract always enforces. Monitor mode is a request-rollout switch; standalone callers read the Result instead, so the app-wide Permittable.mode is ignored here.
  • No router-key exemption. unknown: :error flags a stray action or controller key — standalone input has no router to excuse.
  • No memoization. Every #call validates fresh, so one frozen contract is safely reusable and shareable (assign it to a constant).

Exporting OpenAPI (docs that cannot drift)

An exporter emits OpenAPI 3.1 (whose request bodies are plain JSON Schema) from the same frozen data the server enforces. Like the drift guard pointed outward: the docs cannot lie.

bin/rails permittable:openapi                       # JSON to stdout
bin/rails "permittable:openapi[openapi/api.json]"   # write to a file

The task eager-loads the app (also exercising the drift guard), collects every controller with contracts, and maps documented actions onto paths via the route set. OPENAPI_TITLE / OPENAPI_VERSION override the info block. Pipe the output through Swagger UI, Redoc, Postman, or openapi-typescript and your frontend gets compile-time types for every request body.

Or build fragments programmatically — no Rails required:

Permittable::JsonSchema.rule(UsersController.permit_rule_for(:create))  # request-body schema
Permittable::OpenAPI.request_body_for(UsersController, :create)         # OpenAPI requestBody object
Permittable::OpenAPI.operations_for(UsersController)                    # { action => operation }
Permittable::OpenAPI.document(controllers: [...], info: { "title" => "My API" })

Every operation references shared components for the error envelope: a 422 response always, plus a 400 when the contract declares a root:. So consumers get typed errors, not just typed inputs.

What is honestly unrepresentable stays visible instead of guessed. A format: regexp using a Ruby-only construct (or flags) is exported as x-permittable-pattern rather than a mistranslated pattern — including one anchored with ^/$, which in Ruby anchor a line and in ECMA-262 anchor the whole string, so /^\d{5}$/ accepts "evil\n12345" at runtime and publishing that source would promise a stricter rule than the server enforces (use \A/\z, which translate exactly); validate:/transform: are flagged x-permittable-custom-validation/x-permittable-transformed; actions covered only by a catch-all rule on a plain-Ruby host appear under "*" with x-permittable-catch-all; operations whose rule runs in monitor mode carry x-permittable-mode: "monitor"; operations with no matching route — or whose path-and-verb slot another controller already claimed, which one document cannot represent twice — land in x-permittable-controllers instead of being dropped. A templated path segment is declared as a path parameter of type string, because the route set doesn't say what an :id is and the exporter won't invent it. The schema documents the canonical JSON encoding — the runtime additionally accepts string-encoded scalars ("42", "true") for form/query payloads.

Output is deterministic (fixed key order, declaration-order properties), so the generated file can be committed and reviewed as a diff — a contract change shows up in the same PR as its documentation change.

What the schema deliberately does not say

spec/schema_conformance_spec.rb holds the "cannot drift" claim to account: it walks canonical JSON payloads through both the contract and its own exported schema and asserts the verdicts agree.

Where they legitimately differ, the spec names the reason and asserts the direction, so a new divergence fails the suite instead of shipping quietly. Two cases go the safe way — the server accepts what its docs reject, leaving a client that follows the docs merely conservative:

  • Non-canonical encodings. Coercion accepts "30" for an :integer and 1 for a :string, because form and query payloads are all strings. The schema documents the canonical JSON encoding only.
  • null as absence. The runtime reads {"age": null} as {} (absence); JSON Schema cannot express that, so type: integer rejects a null the server would accept and ignore. A nullable: field is not this case — there the null is a value, the exported type widens to say so, and the two agree.

One case goes the other way, and is worth knowing before you hand the document to a client:

  • Bounds JSON Schema has no keyword for. A :json field's max_depth: is enforced by the server but cannot be written as a JSON Schema keyword, so the published document is looser there and an over-nested payload still earns a 422. The bound is not dropped — it is exported as x-permittable-max-depth — so a generator or linter that wants it can read it.

Everything else the exporter cannot translate stays visible as an x-permittable-* extension rather than being guessed at.

How contracts map onto JSON Schema
Contract Emitted schema
required / optional the object's required: array; required strings also get minLength: 1 ("" is absent)
:string :integer :float :boolean string / integer / number / boolean
:date / :datetime string + format: date / date-time
:decimal type: ["string", "number"] + format: decimal (string is the precision-safe encoding)
in: Array / numeric Range enum / minimum + maximum (exclusive ends honoured)
length: minLength/maxLength on strings, minItems/maxItems on arrays
format: pattern, with \A/\z translated to ^/$
default: / desc: / example: default / description / examples
nested block / array object + properties / array + items
unknown: :error additionalProperties: false, at every nesting level
root: the wrapping object, itself required
sensitive: true writeOnly: true (never echoed in responses)

Reference

API

Instance methods

Method Purpose
permitted_params(action = action_name) The cast, validated, defaulted HashWithIndifferentAccess. Raises InvalidParameters on violation (in monitor mode, returns the raw pass-through instead), or ArgumentError when no contract covers the action. Memoized per action, outcome included — a rejection is re-raised rather than revalidated, so a contract runs (and instruments) exactly once per action per request
permittable_violations(action = action_name) The violation details recorded by validating action[] when clean. Triggers the same memoized validation; under enforce it swallows the raise, making "would this request fail?" a one-liner
enforce_params_contract The before_action entry point. Validates rules declared enforce: true and all monitor-mode rules. Public, so hosts can skip_before_action it
render_invalid_parameters(error) The rescue_from target. Renders via the host's render_error when defined, the inline envelope otherwise

Class methods

Method Purpose
permit_params(*actions, **opts, &contract) Declare a contract
permittable_contracts The frozen array of every declared rule — introspectable, testable
permit_rule_for(action) The last rule matching action, or nil

Module

Constant Purpose
Permittable.filter_parameter_registry The live registry of sensitive: field names
Permittable.filter_parameter_registry= Swap in your own duck-typed registry; entries already registered are carried across
Permittable.filter_parameter_proc The single proc Permittable::Railtie appends to config.filter_parameters; consults the current registry at filter time
Permittable.mode / Permittable.mode= App-wide default (:enforce) for rules that don't declare their own mode:
Permittable.error_format / = :envelope (default) or :problem — see RFC 9457 problem+json
Permittable.problem_base_uri / = Base URI for problem type members
Permittable.check_column_types / = Opt in to the type half of the drift guard (default false)
Permittable::InvalidParameters Raised on violation; carries #details and #status
Permittable::JsonSchema Contract data → JSON Schema fragments (.rule, .object, .field)
Permittable::OpenAPI OpenAPI 3.1 assembly (.document, .operations_for, .request_body_for, .components)
Permittable::Generator Contract drafting (.draft, .for_controller, .scan) — see generating draft contracts
Permittable::Audit Coverage across the route set (.entries, .summary, .stale, .format) — see auditing coverage
Permittable::Contract Standalone contracts (.define, #call, #call!, #json_schema, #rule)
Permittable::Matchers RSpec matchers via require "permittable/rspec" — see testing contracts

Errors caught at class load

A bad contract is a programmer error, so it fails when the class loads — never at request time. Every message names the field and explains the fix.

The full list
  • A field declared twice in one contract
  • An unknown option for the field's kind, listing what is allowed
  • An unknown type, listing the supported ones
  • An unknown normalize: or format: preset, listing the presets
  • A format: that is neither a Regexp nor a preset name
  • format:, length:, or normalize: on a non-:string field
  • length: that isn't a non-negative Integer or a Range; in: that doesn't respond to include?
  • A bound no value could satisfy: a reversed or empty Range (in: 65..18, length: 5..2, length: 3...3), an empty in: set, or a length: of 0 on a required field (where "" already violates as missing)
  • validate: or transform: that isn't callable
  • A default: or example: that violates its own field's contract, or an array default:/example: whose elements violate of: — or, for an array declared with a block, an element that isn't a hash the block would accept
  • A default: nil or example: nil on a field that isn't nullable:
  • A :json field's default:/example: that isn't a Hash, or that its own length:/max_depth: would reject
  • A max_depth: that isn't a positive Integer
  • required: true combined with default:
  • A field given both a type and a nested block; an array given both of: and a block
  • An empty contract, or a nested block declaring no sub-fields
  • finalize declared twice, without a block, or inside a nested block
  • permit_params without a block, or an invalid unknown: mode
  • A root: that isn't a single key (several top-level envelopes are a rootless contract with one nested block per key)
  • An invalid mode: (and Permittable.mode = / Permittable.error_format = / Permittable.check_column_types = reject invalid values at assignment)
  • A field whose declared type disagrees with its column's, when Permittable.check_column_types is on
  • A model: that isn't an ActiveRecord class, or model: true that can't be inferred

Compatibility

Requirement Supported
Ruby >= 3.2
Rails / ActiveSupport >= 6.1, < 9
Required dependency activesupport only
Optional actionpack (rendering, before_action), activerecord (drift guard)

actionpack and activerecord are optional because every touchpoint is guarded with respond_to?/defined? — your app brings whatever it already has. The concern works on a plain Ruby object that responds to params, which is what makes it straightforward to unit-test.

Both claims are tested rather than asserted. CI runs the full suite against every ActiveSupport line in the range — 6.1, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, 8.1 — across the supported Rubies (see gemfiles/), and a separate job installs the built gem with nothing but activesupport and exercises every controller-free surface, so "activesupport is the only runtime dependency" cannot quietly stop being true.

The 6.1 floor isn't arbitrary. class_attribute ... default:, which declares the contract registry, arrived in Rails 5.2 — on 5.0 and 5.1 a contract cannot be declared at all — and 5.2/6.0 predate Ruby 3.x support, which this gem's own Ruby floor requires.

Using concerns_on_rails? ConcernsOnRails::Controllers::Permittable is an alias for this module, and sensitive: registrations pool into that gem's shared filter registry.

Development

bundle install
bundle exec rspec                        # the suite, with a coverage report in coverage/
bundle exec rubocop
bundle exec ruby benchmark/overhead.rb   # a full contract vs. the params.permit call it replaces

Releases are automated: bump lib/permittable/version.rb, add a CHANGELOG.md section, then push a vX.Y.Z tag. CI publishes to RubyGems via trusted publishing (OIDC — no API keys stored) and creates the GitHub release.

License

MIT.

About

Typed, validated params contracts for Rails controllers + schema-drift guard

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages