Skip to content

Adding some more elements to PassingTime#1019

Closed
ue71603 wants to merge 5 commits intov2.1-wipfrom
PassingTime-and-CheckConstraints-and-QuayAssignment
Closed

Adding some more elements to PassingTime#1019
ue71603 wants to merge 5 commits intov2.1-wipfrom
PassingTime-and-CheckConstraints-and-QuayAssignment

Conversation

@ue71603
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ue71603 ue71603 commented May 6, 2026

When switching from Call to PassingTime we found that we might need some things that don't exist there.
We suggest to add those to PassingTime.

However, we have the problem, that the things are on CallPartStructure as e.e. checkConstraints might be different. We could have an ArrivalCheckConstraint and a DepartureCheckConstraint. What do you think?

skinkie and others added 5 commits March 2, 2026 10:56
Documentation changes in the XSD for `FreeRecharging`, `Cage`, `RemoteControl`, `LocalControl` and `LockingMechanism`

Refer to #999 for more details
The SIRI import is probably coming from a SIRI copy/paste since the NeTEx occupancy is following the SIRI one.
The NaturalLanguageStringStructure is not NeTEx type, and is only used in this file, and doesn't follow NeTEx style/rules
The SIRI import is crashing some generic NeTEx (and SIRI) import in some implementation (one of them being OpRa). The reason for this crash is difficult to analyse (and depending on the validation engine), but basically related to object redefinition. As a result this import was a useless and dangerous breaking change and has to be removed.
* Update changelog

* Remove redundancy with readme
* Remove duplicates in the changelog details for v1.1.0
* Correct hierarchy of changelog for v1.0.9 and v1.0.8

* Delete change_log.md

Remove redundant file

* Fix link to CHANGELOG in README

* Rename 'Change log' to 'Changelog'

* Update README.md

Co-authored-by: Thibaut Barrère <thibaut.barrere@gmail.com>
Update typo in the name of elements in the repo
@ue71603 ue71603 added this to the netex_2.1 milestone May 6, 2026
@ue71603 ue71603 requested review from Aurige, duexw, skinkie, thbar and trurlurl May 6, 2026 13:25
@ue71603 ue71603 added the enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc. label May 6, 2026
@skinkie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skinkie commented May 6, 2026

Why not in the ServiceJourneyPattern?

@ue71603
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ue71603 commented May 6, 2026

wasn't a good fit in my view. Where should I put it in? I would need to put it in PointInJourneyPattern

@TuThoThai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ue71603, should not this one target v2.1-wip?

@skinkie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skinkie commented May 6, 2026

wasn't a good fit in my view. Where should I put it in? I would need to put it in PointInJourneyPattern

StopPointInJourneyPattern, then it would be applied to all Journeys = less data to be shipped.

@ue71603 ue71603 changed the base branch from v2.0 to v2.1-wip May 6, 2026 20:51
@ue71603 ue71603 changed the base branch from v2.1-wip to v2.0 May 6, 2026 20:55
@ue71603 ue71603 changed the base branch from v2.0 to v2.1-wip May 6, 2026 20:56
@ue71603
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ue71603 commented May 6, 2026

continued here: #1020

@ue71603 ue71603 closed this May 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants