Skip to content

docs(blog): publish bounded gptme and ActivityWatch consulting pilots - #127

Open
TimeToBuildBob wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
content/bounded-gptme-aw-consulting-8697
Open

TimeToBuildBob wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
content/bounded-gptme-aw-consulting-8697

Conversation

@TimeToBuildBob

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Bounded gptme and ActivityWatch consulting pilots

Public offer post for Superuser Labs consulting: two separate paid pilots (gptme and ActivityWatch), a starting rate, an engagement floor, delivery boundaries, and a direct email CTA.

Post: /blog/bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots/
Title: Bounded gptme and ActivityWatch consulting pilots

Offer terms (also in the post)

  • Rate: 2,000 SEK/hour excluding VAT (Superuser Labs Lund AB)
  • Floor: 8 hours (16,000 SEK excluding VAT)
  • Separate gptme and ActivityWatch scopes, each with in/out lists and a written deliverable
  • CTA: erik@bjareho.lt with Pilot: gptme or Pilot: ActivityWatch

Verification

  • Content critic: 0 errors / 0 warnings (780 words, 6 internal links)
  • AI-writing gate: publish (confidence 0.37)
  • Scoped website build (make build) succeeded in this worktree
  • Rendered page contains title, both pilot sections, rate, floor, and email CTA
  • OG image generated at assets/images/og/bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.png (1200x630) and referenced in og/twitter meta tags

Source of truth remains knowledge/blog/2026-09-21-bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.md in the brain repo.

Public offer with separate gptme and ActivityWatch pilot scopes, 2,000 SEK/hour excluding VAT, an 8-hour engagement floor, delivery boundaries, and a direct email CTA.

Git-Session-Id: 8697
@TimeToBuildBob

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Review guide (auto-posted)

Structured warm-up for reviewers — what changed, what to run, where to look.

Key files

  • _posts/2026-09-21-bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.md (+111/-0, Δ111)
  • assets/images/og/bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.png (+0/-0, Δ0)

Suggested verification

  • Run the repo's usual CI-equivalent checks locally

Known risks / watch points

  • No automatic high-risk tags; use file list + diff for judgment.

Suggested review focus

  • Confirm behavior matches the PR description acceptance criteria.
  • Skim the largest diffs first (listed above).
  • If CI is green, spot-check the highest-risk paths called out here.

Generated by scripts/github/pr-warmup-review-guide.py for #127.

@TimeToBuildBob

TimeToBuildBob commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 AI code review

Safe to merge — no P0/P1 findings on latest review

Updated after inline dispositions on finding threads — this is the current state; the verdict below is frozen at review time and is kept as the historical record of that pass.

Finding disposition
Finding Severity State
_posts/2026-09-21-bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.md:53 P2 accepted-tradeoff

Needs a look — P2 only

Confidence 4/5

1 finding · ⚠️ 1 P2

⚠️ P2 medium_posts/2026-09-21-bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.md:53

The post adds links to five existing articles, but the corresponding entries in _data/backlinks.yml were not regenerated. _layouts/post.pug renders “Referenced by” exclusively from site.data.backlinks[page.url], so those target articles will not show this new post as a backlink. Regenerate and commit the backlink data with the post.

Reviewed dbe32d47b549 · openai-subscription/gpt-5.6-sol · agent engine · 167s · about this reviewer

Maintainer commands

@TimeToBuildBob review (own line) — fresh review · @TimeToBuildBob fix — a worker acts on the findings. Once per comment; 👀 = received.

@TimeToBuildBob

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Current head dbe32d47b549 is CI-green and MERGEABLE. Subscription-backed agent review is on this head (P2 6a6d5b864a71 disposed as an accepted tradeoff: scoped --paths sync skips corpus-wide backlink regeneration by design).

I did not merge: self-merge-check.py refuses an agent review with no 2-of-3 consensus record. LLM consensus 402s on OpenRouter prepaid credits (limit_source=openrouter_credits, prompt ~7622 tokens vs ~1k remaining), not a daily-key reset. Greptile is dark on this repo (Greptile review not found (credit-exhausted or dark)). Same blocker family as #114, #118, #120, and #122.

Waiting for credit recovery, a Greptile current-head review, or human merge. Recheck scheduled for 2026-09-22T00:15:00Z. No quality-gate bypass used.

Source post is already on brain master: knowledge/blog/2026-09-21-bounded-gptme-and-activitywatch-consulting-pilots.md.

The five articles this post links to now list it under Referenced by.
Scoped --paths publish skips corpus-wide regeneration; this commit
adds only those five inbound entries.

Git-Session-Id: pm-127
@TimeToBuildBob

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

P2 6a6d5b864a71 is fixed on a76a3e8cf492, not left as a tradeoff.

_data/backlinks.yml now lists this post as inbound on the five linked articles. Surgical insert only — no corpus-wide rewrite.

In-band consensus still 402s on OpenRouter prepaid credits (same family as #114, #118, #120, #122), so this is not self-merge eligible yet. Subscription-backed sweep should re-review the new head.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant