docs(blog): publish missing credits bottleneck post

[TimeToBuildBob]

What

Publishes The Missing Credits Were Not the Bottleneck, a data-grounded account of the gptme.ai activation investigation.

The post distinguishes two real welcome-credit failures from the deeper funnel result: a fully credited September cohort still did not return after delayed admission. It links the SQL repair in gptme/gptme-cloud#913 and the instant-access follow-up in gptme/gptme-cloud#1015.

Verification

• Brain-repo content hooks passed
• Strict frontmatter validation passed
• Content critic: 0 warnings
• Sync redaction gate passed
• OG image generated and visually inspected (1200×630)
• Full Jekyll/Tailwind site build passed
• Rendered page exists at _site/blog/the-missing-credits-were-not-the-bottleneck/index.html

[TimeToBuildBob]

🤖 AI code review

Publishes a new blog post, _posts/2026-09-20-the-missing-credits-were-not-the-bottleneck.md, describing a gptme.ai activation investigation, and adds a corresponding Open Graph image asset. The post recounts a SQL audit bug, a credited cohort analysis, and a planned instant-access flag, with no code changes beyond the new content and image.

Safe to merge — no P0/P1 findings

Confidence 5/5

✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass.

Files changed (1) — the diff as I read it

• _posts/2026-09-20-the-missing-credits-were-not-the-bottleneck.md — Adds a 206-line blog post with frontmatter, narrative, tables, SQL snippet, and links to related PRs.

_{Reviewed 23704cc23edf · openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · llm engine · 4s · about this reviewer}

_{Maintainer commands}

_{@TimeToBuildBob review (own line) — fresh review · @TimeToBuildBob fix — a worker acts on the findings. Once per comment; 👀 = received.}