Skip to content

Conversation

@ssurt2
Copy link

@ssurt2 ssurt2 commented Dec 5, 2025

style(Graphics):Overview: Updated page for DDK 25.2 release.
Added links for the extensions we support.

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

I do not think these links are needed, but if others want them they should at least be anonymous (two underscores at the end).

@Antonios-C
Copy link
Collaborator

Antonios-C commented Dec 8, 2025

I do not think these links are needed, but if others want them they should at least be anonymous (two underscores at the end).

The links are a nice addition to the docs.

@ssurt2 I do agree with @StaticRocket on the anonymous links. Since these links targets are only used once.

@Antonios-C
Copy link
Collaborator

@ssurt2 the commit title is a bit vague.

Maybe: style(Graphics): Add links to all supported extensions ? Change it however you like you tho .

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Collaborator

@Antonios-C Antonios-C left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bit of a nit pick, commit message mentions "Overview" when all commit diffs are not on the overview.rst, but instead overview.rst includes the extension files. I wouldn't ask for another revision.

This looks good to me. Thank you for your help. Great job Shriya on your first 1st contribution to the docs !

@github-actions
Copy link

New warnings found with rstcheck:

source/linux/Foundational_Components_Multimedia_wave5.rst:740: (INFO/1) Duplicate implicit target name: "example commands".
source/linux/Foundational_Components_Multimedia_wave5.rst:823: (ERROR/3) Error in "code-block" directive:
source/linux/Foundational_Components_Multimedia_wave5.rst:835: (ERROR/3) Error in "code-block" directive:

StaticRocket
StaticRocket previously approved these changes Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@cshilwant cshilwant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ssurt2 please plan to handle - #559 (comment)

@Antonios-C
Copy link
Collaborator

@ssurt2

  • For EGL_IMG_cl_image, leave the extension without a link
    • Also leave a note at the bottom of all extension files, stating that all extensions without links are custom IMG extensions. Syntax for note is .. note::
  • For EGL_MESA_configless_context, change the link to this

Copy link
Member

@StaticRocket StaticRocket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Double check those few IMG links. If there's a proper spec definition I want people to see that first. We should only link to IMG docs if there really is no other information, otherwise people might incorrectly assume this is some IMG specific thing.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Antonios-C Antonios-C left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit title and message need to be changed.

You are incorporating feedback you have received on previous revisions of this PR within the commit message. If you do want to list and track changes between revisions follow this guide (specifically the section regarding patch changelogs).

From an outside perspective (someone that hasn't been following this PR), if they read the commit message they will get confused by "remove link for EGL_IMG_cl_image", as there was no link to begin with.

I suggest your commit to look something like this:

feat(Graphics): Add hyperlinks to all supported extensions

Add hyperlinks to all supported extensions. Add note regarding any missing links.

signed-off ......

Add anonymous hyperlinks to all supported extensions.
Add note section for extensions without links.

Signed-off-by: Shriya Surti <a0511311@ti.com>
Comment on lines +58 to +60
.. note::

All extensions without links are custom IMG extensions.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The indentation here is incorrect. Additionally, the GL_IMG_texture_format_BGRA8888 and GL_IMG_texture_npot are still defined. They should be dropped and those sections should have a similar note

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants