Skip to content

Conversation

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

  • refactor(names): remove PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES

    Remove the PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES replacement definition since it is no
    longer used.

    Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp rs@ti.com

  • refactor(names): use shorter replacement name

    Replace all instances of PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES with
    PART_FAMILY_NAME since the two are equivalent.

    Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp rs@ti.com

  • fix(TDA4VM): set PART_FAMILY_NAME to device

    All platforms currently use PART_FAMILY_NAME to point at an explicit
    device name. Update this platform to match.

    Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp rs@ti.com


Opening as a draft for now as there are other cleanup efforts I assume will clash with this currently.

All platforms currently use __PART_FAMILY_NAME__ to point at an explicit
device name. Update this platform to match.

Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <rs@ti.com>
Replace all instances of __PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES__ with
__PART_FAMILY_NAME__ since the two are equivalent.

Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <rs@ti.com>
Remove the __PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES__ replacement definition since it
is no longer used.

Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <rs@ti.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmenti jmenti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Making sure there is no bug in the variable you are modifying, but other than that, this looks good to me

------------

In today's fast-paced automotive industry, the ability to achieve quick processor boot times is more crucial than ever. This guide will walk you through the necessary steps and considerations for achieving faster boot times on |__PRODUCT_LINE_NAME__| |__PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES__| devices. From adjusting configurations to implementing best practices, you'll gain the insights needed to deliver a seamless, responsive user experience in your automotive applications. By implementing specific modifications, the default SDK offering can be optimized to boot much faster.
In today's fast-paced automotive industry, the ability to achieve quick processor boot times is more crucial than ever. This guide will walk you through the necessary steps and considerations for achieving faster boot times on |__PRODUCT_LINE_NAME__| |__PART_FAMILY_NAME__| devices. From adjusting configurations to implementing best practices, you'll gain the insights needed to deliver a seamless, responsive user experience in your automotive applications. By implementing specific modifications, the default SDK offering can be optimized to boot much faster.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a bug?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you think this is a bug?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if the diff here is tricking me, but:
considerations for achieving faster boot times on |PRODUCT_LINE_NAME| |
PART_FAMILY_NAME|
is the second variable missing the leading pipe?

| Range 2 (MCU_PORz to SBL_start):
| MCU_PORz is the Power-On-Reset pin that is set HIGH as soon as the PMIC powers the voltage rails. This can be probed using Pin #28 on the MCU Header (J11) of the |__PART_FAMILY_DEVICE_NAMES__|. All pins are automatically set HIGH at this point.
| MCU_PORz is the Power-On-Reset pin that is set HIGH as soon as the PMIC powers the voltage rails. This can be probed using Pin #28 on the MCU Header (J11) of the |__PART_FAMILY_NAME__|. All pins are automatically set HIGH at this point.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question here.

@StaticRocket StaticRocket added the blocked Waiting for external dependency label Dec 1, 2025
@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member Author

Marking this as blocked until the current release's influx of PRs has settled down.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

blocked Waiting for external dependency

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.