-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Update static export support details in documentation #6375
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
clicktodev
wants to merge
2
commits into
TanStack:main
Choose a base branch
from
clicktodev:document-next-static-export-limitation
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
Next.js App Router static export useParams() limitation💡 Result:
Short answer: With App Router and output: "export" (static HTML export), client-side useParams() can't get dynamic route values at build/runtime — App Router requires generateStaticParams() (or server params) to statically generate dynamic pages. If you use output: "export" without generateStaticParams for a dynamic segment, the build will error or the client hook can't be populated. [1][2][3]
What to do (brief):
Sources:
🌐 Web query:
Next.js static export dynamic routes App Router client component hooks💡 Result:
Short answer — yes, but with constraints.
Key points and steps
Practical recipe
Sources
🌐 Web query:
Next.js 15 App Router static export useParams() support compatibility💡 Result:
Short answer: App Router + output: "export" (static HTML export) does not fully support client useParams() for dynamic routes unless you pre-generate those routes with generateStaticParams(); dynamic routes without generateStaticParams are listed as unsupported for static export. If you need dynamic client-side params without generateStaticParams, you must not use output: "export" (run with a server) or switch to an approach that pre-renders all param values. [1][2][3]
Sources:
Clarify the Static Export limitation—it's about dynamic routes, not useParams() support.
The note "App Router doesn't support useParams()" is misleading. App Router supports the
useParams()hook; the limitation is that static exports don't support dynamic routes unless routes are pre-generated viagenerateStaticParams(). With proper use ofgenerateStaticParams(), client-sideuseParams()works fine.Consider revising to: "Static export requires generateStaticParams() for dynamic routes" or similar, to accurately reflect the constraint.
Additionally, per the legend on line 23, partial support (🟡) should include a 1–5 rating where noted. Add one if applicable.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents