Skip to content

fix(marketing): add FAQ and Support pages to navigation and sitemap - #39

Merged
rclanan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/marketing-faq-support
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

rclanan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/marketing-faq-support

Conversation

@rclanan

@rclanan rclanan commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The SEO backlog names FAQ and Support as top-level sitemap pages, but those routes return 404 on the live site. Add indexable pages using the existing site shell, documented contact channels and local CLI guidance; link both from the shared footer. The sitemap generator includes both canonical URLs automatically.

Validation: CSS and static builds pass; source/generated pages are synchronized; all 120 internal links pass. Connected Orca DOM checks at 898px and 388px confirm both pages render the expected content, have one main landmark, working footer destinations, 36px headings and no horizontal overflow. The generated sitemap contains 50 canonical URLs including both pages. Screenshot capture was unavailable; these are browser DOM checks.

Part of SaaSy-Solutions/mockforge#454. Google Search Console ownership and sitemap submission are verified separately; its sitemap fetch error remains open. This PR does not close that remaining acceptance work.


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@codedig-ai

codedig-ai Bot commented Oct 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🟢 CodeDig PR Analysis — Low Risk (Score: 99/100)

Summary

Metric Value
Files Changed 1
Total Findings 0
Critical 0
High 0
Public API Changes 0
New PII Flows 0
Complexity Spikes 0
Co-change Risks 0

Risk Budget: 0/100 consumed (green status)

| Coverage data | not available |

🧪 Test Coverage Delta (no data)

Coverage data not available for this repo — enable via Settings → Coverage

→ View full report


Powered by CodeDig

@codedig-ai codedig-ai Bot added codedig/blast-low Blast radius low — ≤ 10 callers affected codedig/effort-1 Effort score 1/5 — minimal blast radius and complexity codedig/risk-green Risk budget < 50 % — safe to merge labels Oct 12, 2026
@rclanan
rclanan merged commit 3fb4f44 into main Oct 12, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

codedig/blast-low Blast radius low — ≤ 10 callers affected codedig/effort-1 Effort score 1/5 — minimal blast radius and complexity codedig/risk-green Risk budget < 50 % — safe to merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant