Polish CSS spacing, color scheme etc#25
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 48 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughMinor documentation content fixes across three About pages and CSS updates to ChangesDocumentation content fixes
CSS styling updates
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css (1)
152-158: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winRemove the empty line before each
backgrounddeclaration.Stylelint is already flagging Lines 157, 169, 181, and 250 with
declaration-empty-line-before, so this file will not pass lint as written.Also applies to: 164-170, 176-181, 245-251
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css` around lines 152 - 158, Remove the empty line before each background declaration in the repeated callout style blocks so they satisfy the declaration-empty-line-before rule. Update the .callout-note and the other matching callout selectors in app.css by keeping background directly after the preceding declaration, preserving the existing styles while eliminating the lint violations.Source: Linters/SAST tools
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@Redot-Documentation/docs/About/complying_with_licenses.md`:
- Around line 4-22: Remove the temporary `### WILL REMOVE EXTRAS AFTER TESTING`
heading and the placeholder `:::info` / `:::danger` admonition blocks from
`complying_with_licenses.md`, or replace them with final production content
before merging. Update the heading structure in this document so it follows a
valid hierarchy under the existing top-level heading, using the relevant section
titles in `comlying_with_licenses.md` as the place to insert the real content.
- Line 5: The placeholder heading in the complying_with_licenses markdown breaks
heading order by jumping from the top-level title to an h3, so update that entry
in the document to use an h2 if it should remain, or remove the temporary “WILL
REMOVE EXTRAS AFTER TESTING” line entirely. Check the surrounding markdown in
this docs file for migration artifacts and keep heading levels consistent with
the document structure.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css`:
- Around line 152-158: Remove the empty line before each background declaration
in the repeated callout style blocks so they satisfy the
declaration-empty-line-before rule. Update the .callout-note and the other
matching callout selectors in app.css by keeping background directly after the
preceding declaration, preserving the existing styles while eliminating the lint
violations.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 7aa8b483-2616-4ad7-a92e-d6218530a456
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Redot-Documentation/docs/About/complying_with_licenses.mdRedot-Documentation/docs/About/introduction.mdRedot-Documentation/docs/About/list_of_features.mdRedot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css (2)
170-176: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winRemove the extra blank line before
background.Stylelint is already flagging this block, so this will keep the stylesheet failing lint until the empty line is removed.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css` around lines 170 - 176, The .callout-warning rule in app.css has an extra blank line before the background declaration, which is causing the Stylelint failure. Remove that empty line in the .callout-warning block so the declarations are contiguous and the stylesheet passes lint.Source: Linters/SAST tools
321-327: 🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
min-width: 85%makes the content column too rigid.Line 327 overrides the earlier
min-width: 0, so the content pane can no longer shrink with the grid. With the TOC widened to 300px, this is likely to cause horizontal overflow or cramped layouts on narrower viewports. Keep the shrinkablemin-width: 0and constrain withmax-widthonly.Suggested fix
.doc-viewer-content { min-width: 0; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; max-width: 85%; - min-width: 85%; }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css` around lines 321 - 327, The .doc-viewer-content rule is overriding the intended shrinkable layout by setting min-width to 85%, which can cause overflow when the TOC gets wider. In the app.css styling for .doc-viewer-content, keep the existing min-width: 0 behavior and remove the rigid min-width constraint so the column can shrink naturally while still using max-width to bound its size.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@Redot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css`:
- Around line 170-176: The .callout-warning rule in app.css has an extra blank
line before the background declaration, which is causing the Stylelint failure.
Remove that empty line in the .callout-warning block so the declarations are
contiguous and the stylesheet passes lint.
- Around line 321-327: The .doc-viewer-content rule is overriding the intended
shrinkable layout by setting min-width to 85%, which can cause overflow when the
TOC gets wider. In the app.css styling for .doc-viewer-content, keep the
existing min-width: 0 behavior and remove the rigid min-width constraint so the
column can shrink naturally while still using max-width to bound its size.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d8b07098-359f-444c-a4b2-2fe109b95992
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Redot-Documentation/docs/About/complying_with_licenses.mdRedot-Documentation/wwwroot/app.css
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Redot-Documentation/docs/About/complying_with_licenses.md
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Style