Extend SNAP Heat and Eat SUA treatment to 12 more states#8132
Open
PavelMakarchuk wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
Open
Extend SNAP Heat and Eat SUA treatment to 12 more states#8132PavelMakarchuk wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
PavelMakarchuk wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8132 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 85.36% 71.79% -13.57%
===========================================
Files 3 4553 +4550
Lines 41 66183 +66142
Branches 2 336 +334
===========================================
+ Hits 35 47517 +47482
- Misses 6 18659 +18653
- Partials 0 7 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Previously only Colorado (effective 2024-10-01) was marked as a Heat and Eat state in gov.usda.snap.income.deductions.utility.always_standard. Per FRAC and LIHEAP Clearinghouse, 12 additional jurisdictions with long-standing Heat and Eat programs should receive the same treatment: CA, CT, DC, MA, MD, ME, MI, NY, OR, PA, RI, WA All are set to true effective 2015-10-01 (the file's baseline date) since each operated Heat and Eat continuously before that date and preserved it after the 2014 Farm Bill raised the nominal LIHEAP minimum to $20.01. Montana (also currently H&E per FRAC) is excluded here pending primary-source verification of its start date; it should be added in a follow-up. Three snap_excess_shelter_expense_deduction tests that relied on the default state (CA) are pinned to TX so they continue exercising the non-H&E path. References: Issue #8131; 7 CFR §273.9(d)(6)(iii)(E); FRAC blog 'Cuts to Utility Deductions in SNAP'; LIHEAP Clearinghouse brief 'A New Framework for Heat and Eat' (2014). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
c25ca78 to
faf28d8
Compare
Replaces the multi-sentence description with a single declarative sentence, spells out SNAP in the description (standard per PE parameter-patterns skill), and makes the label descriptive. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drops the FRAC blog (nonprofit advocacy; not a primary source) and adds the 2014 Farm Bill § 4006(b) statute that established the $20.01 minimum LIHEAP benefit required for SUA eligibility. Retains the federal regulation, the USDA State Options Report, and the LIHEAP Clearinghouse technical brief (hosted at acf.gov, invoked under the 'unless no official source exists' exemption since no consolidated federal list of Heat and Eat states is published). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Same fix as for snap_excess_shelter_expense_deduction: the tests used the default state (CA), but CA is now a Heat and Eat state after this PR, so SUA is always applied regardless of heating/cooling expenses. Pinning to TX preserves the pre-H&E assumption that snap_deductions only reflects the explicitly-set standard + child support amounts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified against ACF LIHEAP Reports to Congress FY2016-FY2022 (Part III, Household Data, Table 3 footnote on nominal SNAP benefits): - Michigan first appears as a nominal-SNAP-benefit state in FY2017 (not FY2016), so the correct start date is 2016-10-01, not 2015-10-01. - Montana is listed in every LIHEAP RTC from FY2016 through FY2022 ($25 nominal benefit to SNAP households), so it belongs in the list. Earlier PR excluded MT citing "no primary-source start date" — the RTC footnotes are the primary source and support 2015-10-01. California, Maryland, and DC never appear in any FY2016-FY2022 RTC. FRAC's April 2026 list notes these states operate Heat and Eat "using LIHEAP or state-funded energy assistance" — the state-funded mechanism wouldn't show up in federal LIHEAP reporting, so their start dates require state-plan-level verification. Not included in this PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Extends the SNAP Heat and Eat (H&E) "always apply the Standard Utility Allowance" treatment to 12 jurisdictions that operate H&E but were missing from
gov.usda.snap.income.deductions.utility.always_standard— previously only Colorado was markedtrue.Closes #8131.
States added (12)
All 12 operated H&E continuously since before our parameter coverage starts (2015-10-01) and preserved it after the 2014 Farm Bill raised the nominal LIHEAP minimum to $20.01.
Montana (also currently H&E per FRAC) is excluded from this PR pending primary-source verification of its start date — it's not in the 2014 LIHEAP Clearinghouse list of pre-Farm-Bill states, so adding it at 2015-10-01 would likely overstate coverage. Follow-up issue/PR recommended.
Legal basis
OBBBA caveat (not in scope for this PR)
OBBBA Section 10004 (signed July 4, 2025) restricts H&E SUA to households containing an elderly (60+) or disabled member, effective per FNS guidance. That's a household-level restriction, not a state-level one, and requires variable-level changes (condition on
has_usda_elderly_disabled). Should be a separate PR.Test plan
snap_state_using_standard_utility_allowance.yamlcovering CA/NY/PA/CO (pre-2024-10 and post), TX — all passsnap_excess_shelter_expense_deduction.yamltests that relied on the default state (CA) pinned to TX so they continue exercising the non-H&E pathmake formatclean🤖 Generated with Claude Code