Conversation
SI 2012/2885 Sch 4 (England), WSI 2013/3029 Sch 3 (Wales; SI 2012/3144 for 2013-14) and SSI 2012/319 Sch 2 (Scotland) disregard from a pension-age applicant's and partner's net earnings £25 a week for a lone parent, £10 for a couple and £5 otherwise, plus £17.10 where a work condition is met and net earnings at least equal the other disregards, the childcare charges and £17.10. Scotland read £37.10 from 6 April 2020 to 4 April 2021 (SSI 2020/108). The model disregarded no earnings. The schedules repeat the Housing Benefit pension-age schedule word for word and net earnings are defined as for Housing Benefit (SI 2012/2885 Sch 1 para 19), so the Housing Benefit net earnings and work conditions from #1908 are reused. Stacked on #1908. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WSI 2013/3029 Sch 1 para 11(9) and 13; SSI 2012/319 regs 31(8) and 33. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 2, 2026
A property over 2015-2030 at working and pension age: £5, £10 or £25 a week, plus £17.10 (£37.10 in 2020) where a work condition holds, times 52. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An integer year before 2015 reads 1 January, before the schemes began on 1 April 2013; read 30 April explicitly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stacked on #1908 (Housing Benefit earnings disregards), whose net earnings and work-condition variables it reuses. Retarget to
mainonce #1908 merges; CI runs on PRs intomainonly.Problem
Pension-age Council Tax Reduction in England, Wales and Scotland disregards no earnings.
council_tax_reduction_applicable_incometakes all income less tax, National Insurance and half of pension contributions, and the only adjustments it applies are the Pension Credit passport and the savings-credit-only rule (#1909). The national pensioner rules disregard £5, £10 or £25 a week of earnings, plus £17.10 where a work condition is met. These are sums fixed in law, like the Housing Benefit ones #1908 freezes. A pensioner earning £1,000 a year who is on the CTR taper loses £52 a year of CTR (20% of £260).This is a real run of both branches, and it is the end-to-end YAML case below.
Law
All texts were read from legislation.gov.uk CLML (
/data.xml) on 2026-10-02, including point-in-time versions. They are saved with the research notes. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.England: The Council Tax Reduction Schemes (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/2885), Schedule 4, "Sums disregarded from applicant's earnings". Applied by Sch 1 para 17(9): "The sums specified in Schedule 4 (sums disregarded from earnings) are to be disregarded in calculating— (a) an applicant's earnings".
Wales: The Council Tax Reduction Schemes and Prescribed Requirements (Wales) Regulations 2013 (WSI 2013/3029), Schedule 3, "Sums disregarded from applicant's earnings: pensioners" (applied by Sch 1 para 11(9); net earnings Sch 1 para 13). The paragraphs are numbered as in England and use the same sums:
Scotland: The Council Tax Reduction (State Pension Credit) (Scotland) Regulations 2012 (SSI 2012/319), Schedule 2, "Sums to be disregarded in the calculation of earnings" (applied by reg 31(8); net earnings reg 33). The sums are:
That text was substituted on 6 April 2020 by the Council Tax Reduction (Scotland) Amendment (No. 3) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 (SSI 2020/108) reg 3(a). Before then para 10 read £17.10. Point-in-time versions at 1 April 2013 and 1 April 2019 read "increased by £17.10".
Amounts over time.
The lone-parent reading. Para 1 caps the total only where two or more of paras 2 to 5 apply, and para 8 is withheld only where a £20 disregard applies. Read literally, a pensioner lone parent could therefore add para 8's £5 to para 2's £25. The schedules are the Housing Benefit pension-age schedule (SI 2006/214 Sch 4) word for word, and this PR follows the reading #1908 adopts for Housing Benefit: £25 in all. DWP's Housing Benefit guidance manual (BP2 para P2.159, citing HB(SPC) Sch 4 para 2) treats £25 as the maximum disregard for a lone parent.
Change
gov.local_authorities.{england,wales,scotland}.council_tax_reduction.pensioners.earnings_disregard, each withsingle(£5),couple(£10),lone_parent(£25) andadditional(£17.10):uprating;additionalis £37.10 from 6 April 2020 and £17.10 again from 5 April 2021;council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard(new, benefit unit, annual):housing_benefit_net_earningsandmeets_housing_benefit_additional_earnings_disregard_conditionsfrom Take Housing Benefit earnings disregards from net earnings only #1908. Their law is the same: SI 2012/2885 Sch 1 para 19, WSI 2013/3029 Sch 1 para 13 and SSI 2012/319 reg 33 against HB(SPC) reg 36(2), and each para 10(2) against HB(SPC) Sch 4 para 9(2).council_tax_reduction_applicable_amountuses (any member over State Pension age).council_tax_reduction_applicable_income: the general-rules branch subtracts the disregard. The Guarantee Credit passport (income 0) and the savings-credit-only rule (the Secretary of State's assessment, which already applies Pension Credit's own earnings disregards) are unchanged. Local working-age schemes such as Oxford's read this variable but have no pension-age families, so they are unaffected.Tests
council_tax_reduction/council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard.yaml, 20 cases), each hand-computed in a comment. Everyone is aged 70 and below the personal allowance, so net earnings equal gross earnings unless stated.test_council_tax_reduction_pensioner_earnings_disregard_properties.py; Hypothesis,derandomize=True, 5 examples of up to 30 families; single, couple, lone parent and couple with children; ages 18 to 90; hours including 15, 16, 29 and 30; earnings £0 to £60,000; disability; State Pension; all four UK nations). The invariants:>in place of "equal or exceed";council_tax_reduction/) and HB YAML pass unchanged on this branch: see the counts in the review comment.Dataset impact
Real Microsimulation runs of #1908's head (38a528c, the base) and this branch (5006d9e) on the Enhanced FRS 2024-25 with current weights. Aggregates only.
Not in this PR
council_tax_reduction_pensioner(SPC qualifying age and no income-related benefit or UC award). Whichever lands after this PR could switch the gate to it.Overlaps
council_tax_reduction_applicable_income.py. This PR changes only the general-rules line, its comment and the documentation, so conflicts are line-level.Invariants
These are the five properties above. Intended violations: none, apart from the pinned 2020 HB/CTR difference in England and Wales, which is the law.
axiom: SI 2012/2885 Sch 4 paras 8, 10; WSI 2013/3029 Sch 3; SSI 2012/319 Sch 2 — TheAxiomFoundation/rulespec-uk#418 queued
🤖 Generated with Claude Code