-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Add callModel API with multiple consumption patterns #49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8c60b77
Merge branch 'main' into mattapperson/feat/getResponse
mattapperson b65d547
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into mattapperson/feat/get…
mattapperson aedcf10
chore: merge main and regenerate SDK with getResponse features
mattapperson 2009531
refactor: rename getResponse to callModel
mattapperson da60edc
feat: expose callModel from SDK client via code regions
mattapperson 4cd7a40
re-add
mattapperson cf0379d
fix: export ToolType from SDK index
mattapperson 78dd5a5
feat: include tool responses in getNewMessagesStream
mattapperson ed1a823
test: add deep shape validation for message streams
mattapperson e249419
test: add comprehensive shape validation for fullChatStream events
mattapperson d6efe9d
ci: add explicit e2e tests step to PR validation
mattapperson 02d5121
ci: disable examples typecheck due to Speakeasy generation bugs
mattapperson 0162e6e
fix: use consistent zod/v4 imports in tests
mattapperson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I think we should use pnpm + pnpm dlx for these actions still, unless we think there's no gain using pnpm -- at that point I'd want to move all to npm