[rororowyourboat]

Change

Render native requirement views with dedicated definition/usage cards, declared identifiers and documentation, explicit typing/ownership, and positive or negated satisfaction links. Selection exposes exact relationship endpoints and source declarations, including anonymous satisfaction declarations and repeated names under different owners.

The existing named-view worker contract now carries validated AST-backed requirement metadata. Source remains authoritative; requirement diagrams allow browsing and presentation movement while semantic authoring controls stay disabled. Requirement graphs fit larger scopes, and pointer/keyboard movement preserves compatible version-1 geometry across reopen.

Evidence

• npm run check: 141 Vitest tests and 10 Node checks passed, alongside formatting, architecture and TypeScript checks.
• Fresh production builds passed; existing bundle-size warning remains.
• npm audit --audit-level=low: no vulnerabilities.
• Actual pinned worker/WASM evidence: 14 retained artifact validations; Go bridge tests and derived preparation passed.
• Complete functional project: all 92 scenarios passed without retries or skips, including five requirements workflows and keyboard movement preservation.
• Complete visual project: all 51 comparisons passed in 3.7 minutes without baseline updates, retries or skips. Zoom setup was normalized through visible controls after diagnosing differing initial fit scales; no existing baseline or comparison threshold changed.
• Six new requirement captures reviewed at desktop/narrow sizes in both themes. Fault demonstrations detected swapped endpoints, incompatible representation reuse and missing negative-satisfaction text before restoration. The fit regression also failed before its fix.

Hosted Validate run 41772724358 passed for head a88e5da: 141 Vitest tests, ten Node checks, dependency audit, all 13 critical browser workflows and all 51 visual comparisons. The full 92-scenario functional result above is local evidence.

Detailed evidence and limitations: docs/verification.md. Firefox/WebKit and complete accessibility certification were not run.

Compatibility

No production dependency, upstream engine pin/checksum or saved-format version changed. Existing structural diagram families retain their zoom limits; the requirement renderer has a lower fit limit. Incompatible representation changes reject previous geometry instead of borrowing it.

The capacity and explicit traceability examples establish the native requirement subset. The compressor requirements view stays a generic tree. Declared satisfaction is model content, not an executed verification result; full standard notation, typed-instance trace expansion, automatic diagrams without authored views and generalized edge routing remain follow-ups. No production deployment is included.

Integration review — 2026-11-05

Reviewed against local develop (437cfc9): no concrete Standards or Spec findings. Commit ac7ee9f corrects a stale routing note to distinguish delivered requirement-edge interaction from planned structural/tree work; no application code changed.

• npm run check passed again: formatting, architecture, TypeScript, 141 Vitest tests and 10 Node checks.
• npm run test:e2e -- --project=functional requirements.spec.ts --output=sandbox/playwright/requirements-review-functional: all five scenarios passed (39.6 seconds), using a fresh production build and the pinned engines.
• Inspected all six requirement baselines at desktop/narrow sizes in both themes; existing shared typing-edge paths remain a documented limitation.
• npm run test:e2e -- --project=visual --output=sandbox/playwright/requirements-review-visual: stopped at the user's request to avoid redundant broad testing; 25 passed, one interrupted, 25 did not run. This is not a complete visual pass. No baselines or tolerances changed.
• The earlier complete functional/visual evidence and hosted result above belong to a88e5da; they do not establish hosted CI for the new documentation commit. Full functional tests and dependency audit were not repeated in this review.

Local review logs: sandbox/requirements-review-check.log, sandbox/requirements-review-functional.log, sandbox/requirements-review-visual.log. These ignored files are not included in the PR.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-04T04:23:35.761322Z	a88e5da	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.