-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
batch transactions for delegated accounts to avoid in-flight tx limit #8125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
cloudonshore
wants to merge
15
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/batch-delegated-accounts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+336
−33
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
afbe131
fix: batch transactions for delegated accounts to avoid in-flight tx …
cloudonshore d1a7a5d
fix: handle bridge transaction types in 7702 batch matching
cloudonshore 1155451
fix: include delegated accounts in batch history tracking
cloudonshore 0cf12e4
test: update 7702 bridge matching test to expect correct behavior
cloudonshore 489fd55
fix: skip undefined tx types in 7702 batch matching to prevent swap/b…
cloudonshore 22c0af9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into fix/batch-delegated…
cloudonshore 78691b4
fix: resolve TypeScript errors in delegation check
cloudonshore 79d5b05
fix: separate gas field logic from 7702 batching for delegated accounts
cloudonshore 0ecd574
docs: add changelog entries for both packages
cloudonshore 565248f
style: fix prettier formatting in transaction tests
cloudonshore cc67872
test: add isAtomicBatchSupported mock to submitTx tests
cloudonshore 396f415
merge: resolve CHANGELOG conflict with main
cloudonshore 9bef1f4
chore: fix prettier formatting on .cursor/worktrees.json
cloudonshore 6dd0653
chore: remove mistakenly committed .cursor/worktrees.json
cloudonshore 1197f32
chore: mark new isAtomicBatchSupported action as breaking change in c…
cloudonshore File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you mark this as a breaking change since the clients will need to add the new action handler permissions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. Just to double check, do you think this is the ideal pattern? I could also detect whether the account is delegated directly in bridge-status-controller (via
eth_getCode) to avoid the breaking change, but didn't want the code duplication.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer reusing TransactionController's handler too so this looks good to me