Repository navigation
Conversation
Installation and troubleshooting still told users to install libfuse2. Releases since 2.16.2 use a FUSE3 runtime, so those pages now match the release notes, changelog, and Linux build. Co-authored-by: CloudGPU <mrhy7176@users.noreply.github.com>
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot: I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request |
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
What
The Linux installation and troubleshooting pages still tell users the AppImage needs libfuse2. Releases since 2.16.2 use a FUSE3 type2 runtime (#1682). Those pages now say to install fuse3 (or start with --appimage-extract-and-run) and link the 2.16.2 notes.
Why
libfuse2 (libfuse.so.2) is the dependency that change removed, and current Ubuntu and Fedora releases do not ship it. The overview, changelog, contributor build steps, and Linux release workflow already document fuse3. Following the old pages installs the wrong package.
How verified
Checked the wording against docs/release-notes/2.16.2.md, CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, and .github/workflows/release.yml.
npx vitepress build . in docs/ succeeded with dead-link checking on. The new link resolves to the Linux AppImage section of the 2.16.2 notes.