Type 2 transactions for miner / mtx broadcaster#1174
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
This now also includes a fix from #1160 which was needed to fix the reputation oracle once it fell out of sync. |
Member
Author
|
It also reworks the 'sync'ing logic; previously, all mining cycle completion events would be retrieved, and then worked through. Now, we deliberately work backwards from 'now' until we find a state we know, and then work forward from there; the smaller paging size (required due to long queries for wider ranges in recent blocks on Gnosis) is therefore not an issue. |
302a65c to
2b940f9
Compare
747c03a to
77d6726
Compare
77d6726 to
3e5b001
Compare
ac59954 to
c703366
Compare
40fdb8e to
5b7d30d
Compare
kronosapiens
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The 'proper' fix alluded to in #1172. This is based on top of that, so don't review this one until that one is merged (this is the only reason this is currently marked a 'draft').